The Implausible Engines of Evolution

[Tomn]

I have been absent for some time because of a study overload. Now:

There is still no evidence which shows that the moth gained this genetic trait by a mutation. This is just a label that evolutionists place on the gene to support the theory. When you find solid evidence rather that conjecture, I would appreciate that you should point me to the study or link or scientists name.

[JackBean]

I guess you studied Bible, didn't you? Definitely not science.

I asked you already once and I will do it only once more. Until I won't get the answer I will delete any other post in this thread either from you or from anyone else. So if you want to stop the discussion, do not reply and I will eventually lock this thread.

What else than a mutation would that be?

[Tomn]

A normal genetic trait that has been present in the population every since it was created by God.

Until you can prove that it was a mutation, I will not accept it. This is the thing about evolution: EVERY profitable genetic trait has to have come from mutation in some sort of way. This has not been shown to happen in the majority of or in all species, much less in a small percentage. All evolutionists really do is simply label profitable traits as mutations without proof, and it is labeled as such just because the theory sais so.

[JackBean]

I have locked this topic, becuase it makes no sense to discuss anything with christian blindman. That's the problem with you. Whatever we could come up with, you will always say that the God created that or he wanted to be it so, so there is no way how you could admit you're wrong and evolution (or round Earth) works.

[JackBean]

do you want some mutation?
about20598.html