Login

Join for Free!
118879 members


The Possibilities that the Earth is the First Cell

Debate and discussion of any biological questions not pertaining to a particular topic.

Moderator: BioTeam

The Possibilities that the Earth is the First Cell

Postby kk23wong » Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:05 pm

The absence of lives on the nearby planets can be an evidence to support the following argument:

The natural role of the biosphere is the life cycles of each planet.

Distances between each living planet are out of purposes. It aims at preventing the “life cycles” from other forms of living. If the living organisms in the biosphere of each planet could migrant freely, their form of presence would be more likely to be “bacteria”. In the meantime, the biosphere of each living planet will compete with each other. Despite of the time lapse between their births, such kind of competitions has been eliminated by their distances. The natural mechanism is perfect. The evolution (it refers to the process of growth) of the universe has resulted in the absence of lives on the nearby planets. Hence, it is justified to say that “Every planet is a single world, and all lives end with it.” Life cycles will eventually end. This is too harsh that not everybody can accept. However, “Truth is always one.” The hierarchy of lives has revealed the interconnections among the structures of the Earth. By looking upon it as a unity, we soon understand that the first cell come all at once.

If the Earth herself is the first cell, the hierarchy of lives must be solid. It exposed the nature of the universe. What do you think? Is it a discovery? Is it an empty claim?

If almost everyone denied this assumption, the God will become an illusion forever.
This is the cost the God has to pay for the abuses of her gifted power from birth (the ability to communicate with us) to manipulate our world. Besides, this planet is very strange if we cannot figure out the nature of lives with the present technology level.
Last edited by kk23wong on Mon Jan 03, 2011 4:25 am, edited 5 times in total.
Use Smartphone to Find More Information On My Image
User avatar
kk23wong
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:53 pm
Location: Hong Kong, CN

Postby canalon » Mon Jan 03, 2011 2:55 am

An empty claim based on a premise that make no sense at all.
Patrick

Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)
User avatar
canalon
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: Canada

Re: The Possibilities that the Earth is the First Cell

Postby kk23wong » Mon Jan 03, 2011 4:27 am

How about the others? If the above doesn't make sense, the empty claims such as ghosts (souls), the supernatural God in almost every religion and space migration seem to be more practical. The hierarchy of lives (Lives in Different Levels) can fully explain the Earth - our world - from the very beginning up to now.

Teru Wong
Use Smartphone to Find More Information On My Image
User avatar
kk23wong
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:53 pm
Location: Hong Kong, CN


Postby iam » Thu Jan 13, 2011 3:58 am

It is true that religions are (mostly) empty claims. If there was such thing as a "god", then why would babies die without the chance to live? criminals, getting away with what they've done? I agree with you. It is about the logical implications that you decide to understand.
iam
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 3:12 am


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests