Login

Join for Free!
114461 members


What did Pastor Darwin reveal and conceal about human origin

Discussion of everything related to the Theory of Evolution.

Moderator: BioTeam

Re: Re:

Postby enarees » Mon Nov 22, 2010 5:31 pm

venik wrote:...The modern collegian secular "scientific" community of today, is the 15th century church of yesterday.


Absolutely!
Canalon and JackBean are the contemporary inquisitors.
They keep important secrets for brethrens.
User avatar
enarees
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:16 am

Re: Re:

Postby canalon » Mon Nov 22, 2010 6:49 pm

enarees wrote:Absolutely!
Canalon and JackBean are the contemporary inquisitors.
They keep important secrets for brethrens.


QFT That is why you have been banned to be silenced by those moderators in a blatant show of abuse of power. And we limit the access to the secret database so that the poor uninitiated cannot access scientific evidence that we rely on (and please never look for the bookshelf).

Oh wait.... enarees you are deluded and completely irrelevant when it comes to biology. You might think that you have something of interest to bring to the discussion, but you do not. Yet we do not silence you because your own lack of knowledge, sense, data and relevance is enough to show the world the importance (or lack thereof) of what you have to say.

You are going to make me regret that I am not an inquisitor. I would torture you to death by forcing you to study and educate yourself. I might use books by Dawkins, S.J Gould and Popper. They are full of terrible secrets and in a pile, quite heavy when use to whack the internet trolls into submission.
Patrick

Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)
User avatar
canalon
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: Canada

Postby enarees » Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:14 pm

This is a scary revelation:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19544248

Shintos are not listening to you or something? :wink:
User avatar
enarees
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:16 am


Postby canalon » Wed Nov 24, 2010 10:02 pm

What do you make of that?
An empty egg is fertilized by one or two sperm and develop in an hydatidiform mole (a non viable pocket of embryonic tissue, not an embryo). They abort it, and its normally fertilized twin. I fail to see what would be quite earth-shattering. Would you care to illuminate us?

And before you tell us that androgenesis is thus proved, then I would point that sperm making an incomplete placenta that abort itself, or eliminated by the doctor, is far from being a conclusive proof that androgenesis is a viable reproductive system, don't you think?
Patrick

Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)
User avatar
canalon
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: Canada

Re:

Postby enarees » Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:14 pm

A more suitable, than an empty ovum, environment for mammal androgenesis can be created.

And has been created - many, many times!
User avatar
enarees
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:16 am

Re: Re:

Postby canalon » Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:06 pm

enarees wrote:A more suitable, than an empty ovum, environment for mammal androgenesis can be created.

And has been created - many, many times!

Evidence?
Patrick

Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)
User avatar
canalon
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Re:

Postby enarees » Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:58 pm

canalon wrote:Evidence?


Saint Nicholas's dwarfs.
And many inquisitors who are quite an ancient clan.
User avatar
enarees
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:16 am

Re: Re:

Postby canalon » Wed Dec 01, 2010 1:12 am

enarees wrote:Saint Nicholas's dwarfs.
And many inquisitors who are quite an ancient clan.

:shock: :?
What are you talking about ?
Patrick

Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)
User avatar
canalon
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: Canada

Previous

Return to Evolution

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron