Login

Join for Free!
118838 members


The Fiber Disease

Human Anatomy, Physiology, and Medicine. Anything human!

Moderator: BioTeam

Postby msc » Sun Dec 10, 2006 6:25 am

from msc

one thing more and very very important, we all have to find a product we all used with these types of chemicals in them. print out patent 4877805
on page 7 and 8 list the chemicals used besides lecithin, kobo pigments
and chemicals that are the on the retinoid makeup composition. you need to find out if any medication you used had these retinoids in them
or soy lecithins that cause biofilms anything that had lipids, hydrophilics and lipophilicis, hydrophobics anything that had biological on it. the words EDGMA and HDPE, silicone silica fiber optics. we need to find a common
product or person you came in contact with that used them. everything is about polymerization that is were fibers, threads, ligands plastics all come from being polymerized and look to see if your products use the words nano particles. your patents are the best place to find the words nano and lipids etc. we know it is nano, with know it is plastic silica silicone, was it in medicine we all used, are optic fiber lights a danger to our health things like that we need to find in common. we have to start listing those things we have used and tie it together with the nano research we used. thanks let do this before the holidays get here. lets make it the holiday nobody will forget including those who did this and may they be behind bars before the holdiays get here. that is my goal
they took enough Christmas's from my children they will not take anymore.
msc
Death Adder
Death Adder
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:09 am

Postby msc » Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:07 am

from msc

also, one last thing too, think like an electrican for anyone who has electronic background. these fibers are all various colors correct.
wires in every electrical appliance etc has various wires are covered in a rubber coating of different colors. the green is a ground wire, thet rest carry various electrical energy. we need to know what each color is used for the yellow, the blue, purple (which is more than likely bacteriorhopdospin -- purple membrane glob used as a computer memore encoded with viruses or whatever), the red, we know that it creates crystal structures and crystals are used in communications, we know they used pigments and they are flourescent and are used to coat.
we need a biologist a chemist and an electrician to put all the pieces of the puzzle together. has to do with carbons electrons ions coilloids and light waves and self assembly. what are they self assemblying to our dna and rna? wish i could offer the million dollar prize for the answer, but we have to hope someone is compassionate enought, ethical enough and concerned for their own health and well being to help us.
msc
Death Adder
Death Adder
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:09 am

Postby RANDY » Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:04 am

I am being a realist here. No one is able to keep it simple an dexplaim anything but a large THE world is a dangerous place since the genome was cracked...well DUH!!!

Millions of different types of research are going on because of this...of course it would.....but just because you can cut and paste it and read about it , that does not make it connect with this disease at all.

It is like Tam on steroids....all fluff and no reality..no real European anything knowing anything about him etc.etc.etc. Make believe video...it just keeps going and going and going and when I hit them with reality..they get pretty darn nasty.

This will be known as the disease of BS-ers and people living in delusions and this site will be the proof! This site will define delusional.

You have nothing that you can prove, nothing that can be proven and nothing but conspiracy theories.

You could be talking about any thing at all. Connect it....that is all I asked..full detail on how it connects. No one was able to do that.

Get an electrician to tell you what color wires do what and compare then to what we have. Do you have any idea how crazy that sounds? If not you are in bigger trouble then I can help you with.

This site has become one of people that have no clue at all and are getting further and further from any truth and have no one researching and no one who can even explain the complicated posts that have NOTHING to do with our disease at all except to say that the World is a dangerous place with mean people in it.

I asked for a detailed explanation of what the techincal terms meant and how they related to our disease. Not an overall view of society.

This is just a site filled with disinformation. See people out there that I have spoken to ..they could not do it. My point proven. Total BS.

They have no idea what they are talking about or how it relates and then they call me stupid for calling their bluff.

It is funny to watch but so sad to take a decent site and fill it with such garbage.

Need some real info about thsi disease call me at 434-974-7128. Want to get involved. We will start after the new year.

Write me at CISFl2004@netzero.com

All those who have already contacted me I will get back in touch with you after the new year.

Randy

Thank you!
During the End Times, Good will battle Evil. Where do you stand?
http://unknownskindisease.com
User avatar
RANDY
King Cobra
King Cobra
 
Posts: 882
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:16 am


Postby RANDY » Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:05 am

I am being a realist here. No one is able to keep it simple an dexplaim anything but a large THE world is a dangerous place since the genome was cracked...well DUH!!!

Millions of different types of research are going on because of this...of course it would.....but just because you can cut and paste it and read about it , that does not make it connect with this disease at all.

It is like Tam on steroids....all fluff and no reality..no real European anything knowing anything about him etc.etc.etc. Make believe video...it just keeps going and going and going and when I hit them with reality..they get pretty darn nasty.

This will be known as the disease of BS-ers and people living in delusions and this site will be the proof! This site will define delusional.

You have nothing that you can prove, nothing that can be proven and nothing but conspiracy theories.

You could be talking about any thing at all. Connect it....that is all I asked..full detail on how it connects. No one was able to do that.

Get an electrician to tell you what color wires do what and compare then to what we have. Do you have any idea how crazy that sounds? If not you are in bigger trouble then I can help you with.

This site has become one of people that have no clue at all and are getting further and further from any truth and have no one researching and no one who can even explain the complicated posts that have NOTHING to do with our disease at all except to say that the World is a dangerous place with mean people in it.

I asked for a detailed explanation of what the techincal terms meant and how they related to our disease. Not an overall view of society.

This is just a site filled with disinformation. See people out there that I have spoken to ..they could not do it. My point proven. Total BS.

They have no idea what they are talking about or how it relates and then they call me stupid for calling their bluff.

It is funny to watch but so sad to take a decent site and fill it with such garbage.

Need some real info about thsi disease call me at 434-974-7128. Want to get involved. We will start after the new year.

Write me at CISFl2004@netzero.com

All those who have already contacted me I will get back in touch with you after the new year.

Randy

Thank you!
During the End Times, Good will battle Evil. Where do you stand?
http://unknownskindisease.com
User avatar
RANDY
King Cobra
King Cobra
 
Posts: 882
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:16 am

Postby Skytroll » Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:11 am

When the bell tolls......it tolls for thee.....


s
Last edited by Skytroll on Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:25 am, edited 2 times in total.
Skytroll
King Cobra
King Cobra
 
Posts: 725
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 6:39 pm

Postby Skytroll » Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:27 am

:roll: :lol: :roll:

Skytroll
Last edited by Skytroll on Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Skytroll
King Cobra
King Cobra
 
Posts: 725
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 6:39 pm

Postby Skytroll » Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:31 am

Bless those who hurt, and may the hurt be less because of love.

s
Last edited by Skytroll on Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
Skytroll
King Cobra
King Cobra
 
Posts: 725
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 6:39 pm

Postby London » Sun Dec 10, 2006 9:01 am

Now this is it dammit!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.................

07/24/06 - Science may bring back Neanderthals
RESEARCHERS are planning to reconstruct the genome of Neanderthals, the archaic human species that occupied Europe from 300,000 years ago until 30,000 years ago before being displaced by modern humans. Recovery of the Neanderthal genome, in whole or in part, would be invaluable for reconstructing many events in human prehistory and evolution. It would help address such questions as whether Neanderthals and humans interbred, whether the archaic humans had an articulate form of language, how the Neanderthal brain was constructed, if they had light or dark skin, and how big the Neanderthal population was. One of the most important results that researchers are hoping for is to discover, from a three-way comparison between chimp, human and Neanderthal DNA, which genes have made humans human. If Dr Paabo and 454 Life Sciences succeed in reconstructing the entire Neanderthal genome, it might, in principle, be possible to bring the species back from extinction by inserting the Neanderthal genome into a human egg and having volunteers bear Neanderthal infants. This might be the best way of finding out what each Neanderthal gene does. Scientists are quick to point out the technical and ethical problems in such a venture.

(HEY, i SWEAR, i SAW ONE OF THESE PEOPLE WALKING INTO THE SUPERWALMART AS i WAS LEAVING. AN AT & T TRUCK WAS WAITING ON HIM. SWEAR!) (BUT HE FIT RIGHT IN W/THOSE WALMART FREAKS)
London
King Cobra
King Cobra
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 3:41 am

Postby Deena » Sun Dec 10, 2006 9:07 am

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Go Skytroll, Go Skytroll, uh huh, it's yo birt~ day, uh huh

What a way to end an evening. Much better than last night.

Sweet dreams, all.

Oh ... London!! Aliens? raeleans aliens? :roll: still giggling. can't help it

D.
Deena
Banned
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:37 am

Postby London » Sun Dec 10, 2006 9:39 am

Now Deena Rae., that's not funny :shock: :D

Okay guys, ARE YOU READY????? This is very upclose....the photo starts off with two kids that I think have a lot to do with our fibers, then, if you scroll down the page, there is 4 more photos (3 or 4) the last one shows it too. WHAT? It shows the FIBR LASER

http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/news/03/pr0301_images.htm

AND GUESS WHAT??? IT'S ALL FROM WHERE??? THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION.......OUR OWN GOVERNMENT.....!

YEP. THEY HAVE A FIBR LASER!!!!!!

hERE, READ THE WHOLE STORY....(ONLY A PAGE.)

http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/news/03/pr0301.htm

AND HERE, GO FOR ANOTHER ONE....BE MY GUEST....

http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/news/02/pr0260.htm
London
King Cobra
King Cobra
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 3:41 am

Postby London » Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:04 am

can we get much closer?

Organic molecules adhered to the point of a micropipette were transferred onto the surface of a polymer film by pulsed laser light guided through a quartz optical fiber which was inserted into the micropipette. Controlled by a high-resolution piezoelectric driver designed for scanning probe microscopy, the distance between the micropipette point and the polymer surface was kept to a few tens of nm. After laser irradiation, the deposited molecules on the polymer surface were examined with optical transmission, fluorescence, atomic force, and scanning near-field optical microscopy. It was demonstrated that various kinds of organic molecules can be implanted into sub-micrometer regions at the surfaces of polymer films without their decomposition. The hypothetical mechanism of the molecular transfer is discussed in relation to the morphology of crystalline molecules adhered at the micropipette apertures.

http://www.springerlink.com/content/hbp0uldgdv8kuxxm
London
King Cobra
King Cobra
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 3:41 am

Postby Nadas Moksha » Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:50 am

whAt the hell occured as to have induced another site sweep interrogation by the RAnd corporation??????????
no no no buddy ..... ..
weve got the questions for you.
and youve got a gulf between us and you want us to drain it with forks and spoons ? and if we dont cooperate we are antisemetic and are not sane . .... .. .welll ! ok!!

http://appli1.oecd.org/olis/2006doc.nsf ... 208175.PDF

Breakout Session D
Regulatory Frameworks
The Questions
Do novel properties of existing substances used for nanomaterials create new risks which warrant
notification as new substances?

All regimes would generally treat nanomaterials with existing chemical identities as existing
substances, novel properties alone wouldn‘t change that
BUT

Novel properties trigger concerns about potential hazard and risk and this may not be fully
addressed by current regulatory regimes
Do current regulatory exemptions, weight-based standards and notification and reporting
thresholds developed for conventional chemicals apply or need to be revisited for
application to nanomaterials?

Current regulatory exemptions appear to apply to nanomaterials.
BUT

Nanomaterials weren‘t specifically considered when current regulatory exemptions were put in
place.

Therefore existing exemptions may need to be revisited for nanomaterials.
Do regulatory assessments and policies address:
* the high potential diversity of nanomaterials;
* their wide and expanding array of potential and actual uses;
* the potential for releases or exposures from activities occurring over their full lifecycle;
and
* the rapidly evolving nature of nanotechnology?

Most jurisdictions currently address this to some extent.
How should regulatory assessments and policies address: the diversity of nanomaterials
and their wide and expanding array of potential and actual uses

Approach this considering techniques from traditional chemicals legislation e.g. complex
mixtures, variable composition and grouping.

Use of broad exposure categories e.g. industrial; closed; dispersive may be useful as an element
in assessments and policies.

Need to test against research output and understanding to see if this would work.
How should regulatory assessments and policies address: the potential for releases or
exposures from activities occurring over their full lifecycle

Current approach gives authority to cover these elements in most countries.
Page 46
ENV/JM/MONO(2006)19
46
How should regulatory assessments and policies address: the rapidly evolving nature of
nanotechnology

Need to take care not to stifle innovation.

Important to have ongoing dialogue at international level, and bi/multi-laterally (e.g. lead country
initiatives).

Need to look at rapid evaluation and control systems.

Need to adapt to new paradigms without being too rigid at this stage.
How and under what preconditions should a precautionary approach be applied to
nanomaterials?

Need to gain understanding while at the same time taking steps to minimise exposure and
attendant risks.

Acknowledge known unknowns that relate to important and significant areas and proceed in
measured and responsible manner with assessment.

Any precautionary approach to nanomaterials should be fair, balanced and applied on a case by
case basis.
What basic risk management practices are being used or should be encouraged or
required?

Good practice documents are being developed globally by governments, industry and other
stakeholders.

Such initiatives should be shared with the OECD.
Should on-going environmental and human exposure monitoring requirements be applied
to production, use, and release of nanomaterials?

Group D await outputs from other groups.

A future group needs to return to this.
How can or should the effectiveness of risk management measures and controls be
assessed?

Need to ensure public confidence in risk management procedures.

There are a number of processes and procedures already in place which should help to assess
effectiveness in this area.
The Outcomes
Should nanomaterials be addressed through existing —new“ and —existing“ chemical
assessment processes, or should they be addressed under a separate assessment regime
or some alternate process?

Regulatory regimes may be adequate in most jurisdictions, although further assessment may be
required.

A voluntary approach gathering and developing data and evidence could complement existing
regulatory regimes, help to identify any gaps and inform future work.

In the long term, a new approach may be needed depending on the evidence gathered.
Page 47
ENV/JM/MONO(2006)19
47
What would be an adequate regulatory structure for addressing assessment of
nanomaterials?

Current structure may be adequate but further evaluation is required.

Would like to examine if and when a ”nano data package‘ should be used.

Exemptions and exposure categories may need to be reconsidered.

Lifecycle may need to be further examined.
Is it necessary for jurisdictions to have a harmonised approach? If so, what process is
necessary to harmonise such an approach?

Unanimous desire to work towards harmonisation in some aspects, this could include an
inventory of current research and research in hand.

Recognition of the usefulness of co-ordination and collaboration, particularly re development of
hazard and exposure data and methods.

Lead country approach could be useful.

-nadas
Nadas Moksha
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 7:41 am

PreviousNext

Return to Human Biology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests