Human Anatomy, Physiology, and Medicine. Anything human!
"Morgellons disease does not exist"
But what exists is the presence in public space of a contagious and environmentally resistant man made human pathogen in the form of a GMO (genetically modified micro organism)
This organism can consistently be connected to the unauthorized release of a highly modified GMO and "activity by the bio defense industry. (proteome research center and battlefield lab)
Nota Bene: the difference between offense and defense is rather arbitrary!
The organism is most associated with a synthetic model organism to know "a model organism based on a cyanobacterium"
http://www.technologyreview.com/read_ar ... h&sc=&pg=1
Whatever the motivation may be of the medical and scientific establishment; "they collaborate and keep in existence a most repressive type methodology"
A methodology that seems only to serve and protect vital scientific, economic and in particular military interest.
"I prefer to speak about the dilligent existence of a relentless self serving and seemingly highly corrupt medical and scientific body"
Dr. Pesutic described torture as the “criminal expression of a perversion of society's values.” The criminal and unethical behaviour of doctors involved in or colluding in torture reflects a society's moral decline. The US bioethicist Edmund Pellegrino wrote: “Protection of the integrity of medical ethics is important for all of society. If medicine becomes, as Nazi medicine did, the handmaiden of economics, politics, or any force other than one that promotes the good of the patient, it loses its soul and becomes an instrument that justifies oppression and the violation of human rights.
Thus, whatever the cause may be of this ongoing confusion and incompetence of the medical establishment in relation to the unauthorized release of an environmentally resistant, contagious and pathogenic GMO:
To contact The President's Council on Bioethics:
1801 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20006
E-mail: [email protected]
Notice: All written substantive comments addressed to the President's Council, its chairman, or members of its staff are legally part of the public record and are made available for public inspection at the Council offices on request during regular business hours.
"Whatever the motivation may be of the medical and scientific establishment; "they collaborate and keep in existence a most repressive type methodology"
from your post.
Would that be Koch's postulates? As if there were no other.
Okay, I get it. Thanks.
It seems one can play with the method. "Various interpretations"....
A bit conflicting here......
From outer space?
"To collect particles without damaging them, Stardust uses an extraordinary substance called aerogel. This is a silicon-based solid with a porous, sponge-like structure in which 99.8 percent of the volume is empty space. By comparison, aerogel is 1,000 times less dense than glass, which is another silicon-based solid. When a particle hits the aerogel, it buries itself in the material, creating a carrot-shaped track up to 200 times its own length. This slows it down and brings the sample to a relatively gradual stop. Since aerogel is mostly transparent - with a distinctive smoky blue cast - scientists will use these tracks to find the tiny particles. "
Use in zero-gravity:
Away from aerogels to this interesting one:
http://tst.ewi.utwente.nl/research/sens ... index.html
Sorta like hairs, sorta like ........
"The twofold objective of the CILIA project is to identify the common principles underlying this widespread use in nature of arrays of mechanical sensory cells for the extraction of significant information and to make those principles available for design of engineered systems. Because organisms and their environments form tightly coupled interacting systems in which all components environmental characteristics and dynamics, sensory and physical morphology, peripheral and central neural processing and behavioural patterns play a significant role this analysis will be carried out at three levels simultaneously: the morphology and mechanics, the neuronal processing, and the behavioural strategies of the model-systems. Extraction of significant information is considered an emergent property from processing going on at all three levels. The model systems will be the cerci of crickets, the lateral line system of fish and the auditory system of bats. Knowledge gained from a representative sample of species and individuals from a large phylogenetic and ontogenetic range will be used to formulate design rules for man-made or man-mediated systems. These will include organic neuronal networks (based on neural cells), MEMS based artificial electro-mechanical hair-sensors, and artificial pinnae-movement control."
"In both the visual and olfactory systems a "quantal" mechanism of detection is possible, because the absorption of a photon or the binding of an odorant molecule provides an energy change significantly greater than the thermal noise in the receptor molecule. In hearing, on the other hand, the energy of a phonon is far lower, and detection occurs by a "classical" mechanism. For vertebrate photoreceptors and olfactory receptor cells, sensory transduction employs a G-protein cascade that is remarkably similar in the two cases, and that is closely homologous to other G-protein signalling cascades. For auditory and vestibular hair cells, transduction operates via a mechanism of direct coupling of the stimulus to ion channels, in a manner reminiscent of the direct gating of post-synaptic ion channels in various synaptic mechanisms. The three classes of sensory receptor cell share similarities in their mechanisms of adaptation, and it appears in each case that cytoplasmic calcium concentration plays a major role in adaptation."
So, this can tranduct into invertebrates, the first inductions?..........We have hairs, and seems to be where stem begins......?
"G protein cascades
G protein cascades are characterized by the presence in the transducing membrane of three species of protein molecule: a receptor protein (R), a G protein (G) and an effector protein (E); (Lefkowitz et al., 1986; Ross, 1989; Stryer, 1991) (Figs 1D, E). Activation of the cascade by a stimulus proceeds according to: Stimulus ® R* ® G* ® E*, where the asterisks indicate activated forms. The occurrence of these reactions depends crucially on intermolecular collisions resulting from lateral diffusion of the protein molecules within the membrane (Lamb & Pugh, 1992). A single molecule of R* can repeatedly (or catalytically) activate molecules of G protein to G* (by triggering the exchange of a GTP for a GDP on G). Each activated G* continues diffusing until it contacts a molecule of E, whereupon the two proteins bind to form G*–E, which represents the activated effector, E*.
An important feature of G protein transduction is its potential to provide very high amplification, through the cascading of two stages of gain. The first stage is provided by the activated receptor protein R*, which catalytically activates the G protein. A second stage of gain is provided by the activated effector protein E*, which is typically an enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis (or destruction) of a cytoplasmic messenger molecule. "
http://www.medibolt.com/users/rikr/Grok ... #G_cascade
Much info here
Nuclear transfer? cloning?
tamtam posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 11:48 pm
That's an honorable post.
Right, so much can be done by computer nowadays.
There is no Mother Earth. It is simply earth, humans inhabit earth, animals inhabit earth, amoebas inhabit earth. Computers do not.
So, the biologicial evolutionary changes had to come first, then one could adeptly attach the rest in any way that would bring about total control.
Does the UN own the internet yet?
The earth is natural, and never needed to be tampered with, so as with humans.
Natural, in its existing state, untampered, untamed, unique in its own right., the same as in the beginning, the same in the end, UNLESS, one must make evolution happen.
This is not religion, this is "Natural Law" IT is!
When one wants playgrounds, one will create what is to be in that playground, man makes mistakes, always will.
"NIH's New Ethics Rules Lead Some to Ponder Jumping Ship
By Rita Beamish
Monday, October 30, 2006; Page A15
Nearly 40 percent of the scientists conducting hands-on research at the National Institutes of Health say they are looking for other jobs or are considering doing so to escape new ethics rules that have curtailed their opportunity to earn outside income.
Most scientists say the ethics crackdown is too severe, and nearly three-quarters of them think it will hinder the government's ability to attract and keep medical researchers, according to a survey commissioned by the government's premier medical research agency.
The tightened rules were established last year after NIH found that dozens of scientists had run afoul of existing restrictions with private consulting deals that had enriched them with money from drug and biotechnology companies.
Outside income from such companies is now banned. NIH also is placing greater restrictions and disclosure requirements on employees' financial holdings.
"Of course we are concerned when any employees are saying they might consider leaving as a result of a change of policy," said Raynard S. Kington, the agency's principal deputy director. But he said in a telephone interview Friday that the survey results are muddy because they combine those actively seeking to leave and those thinking about it.
NIH Director Elias A. Zerhouni, in a letter Thursday to the staff, said the survey "does suggest concerns about the impact of the regulations on recruitment and retention." But he added: "At this time we do not anticipate revisions in the regulations."
About 8,000 NIH employees, or about half the workforce, responded to the Internet-based survey. Employee job satisfaction was generally high, the survey found. But 39 percent of the scientists researching disease and cures -- known as tenure and tenure-track scientists -- said they were actively seeking new work or considering leaving NIH because of the rules.
Overall, 3,336 NIH scientists responded to the survey, including 512 tenure and tenure-track researchers.
Among all NIH scientists, 18 percent said they were trying to leave or considering it. Those not in the tenure group typically do not conduct research and instead manage outside research performed with NIH money by universities and other nonfederal entities. They are less likely to have private consulting opportunities.
One-third of all NIH scientists said they thought the new rules would hurt NIH's ability to fulfill its mission, and most said the old rules could have been enforced better rather than tightened.
Kington highlighted a finding that nearly nine in 10 scientists reported they intend to work at NIH a year from now. Despite rumblings of low morale, he said the scientists' job satisfaction rate of 81 percent reflects one of the government's most positive workforces.
Officials also emphasized employees' opinion that the new rules will boost the agency's credibility with the public; 73 percent of the employees who responded agreed with that, the survey found.
Arthur Caplan, medical ethics chairman at the University of Pennsylvania, said tighter rules are needed but "we still haven't figured out exactly how to manage conflict of interest."
"The leaders of the NIH and in Congress have to think a bit harder about giving a tiny bit of breathing room so that NIH scientists are not sent into a monastery from which they can't ever come out in the name of scientific integrity," he said."
The Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 00709.html
So,.......the NIH has always been privy to this information. So.....while you are at it NIH........tell us more. Just what has been put out there?
About "That's an honorable post"
This was an excerpt/ section of a famous publication called critical thinking or critical analysis. Will seek the source and mention the authors later.
I think the description fits the situation.
Remember also heliobacter pylori in 1982 and the introduction of a major (viral based) cause of prostrate cancer early this year.
Such introductions are devastating for much existing interest (...)
Again; my advise is to unite, create a legal base and to seek litigation.
Today the medic and scientist are like priests.
But shake that honorable tree and see what will happen next.
Case after case!
Heaven forbid if causes are found. That has never been the aim of medicine. Only treat the symptoms and they can go on and on and on.......and then one gets new symptoms from the drugs, so change drugs, and newer symptoms, by this time we have a real ongoing biofilm and then add some genes in the newest medicine and that will fix it. Sounds like a bonfire in the making!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 0 guests