Login

Join for Free!
114411 members


The Fiber Disease

Human Anatomy, Physiology, and Medicine. Anything human!

Moderator: BioTeam

Postby Sabrina » Wed Jan 10, 2007 5:20 pm

Come on Frankie boy, tell us all about your ordeal with this infection. We would love to hear how you have come so far with this. I mean, how did you find out? How many doctors did you go to? How has this illness changed your life? Please do share.

Peace,
Sabrina
User avatar
Sabrina
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 8:03 pm

Postby Sabrina » Wed Jan 10, 2007 5:27 pm

Ah, I'm waiting Frankie boy. Earn that pay check! :lol:
User avatar
Sabrina
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 8:03 pm

Postby DS » Wed Jan 10, 2007 5:39 pm

Randy = Smileykins

Or am I the only one that can see through and identify their identical writing styles and favorite words?
DS
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 3:05 am


Postby southcity » Wed Jan 10, 2007 6:05 pm

Perhaps this is the reasons behind the constant personal attacks here against Tam. His consistence should be considered when developing a judgement of him.


From yesterdays news.

The U.S. Navy has also developed a bandage that uses algae fibers to seal wounds and give the body time to form its own blood clots to stop bleeding.
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/16399040.htm
Southcity


"First they ignore you...
Then they laugh at you...
Then they fight you...
Then you win." - Mahatma Gandhi
User avatar
southcity
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 5:52 pm
Location: bay area, ca

Postby ppy1818 » Wed Jan 10, 2007 6:09 pm

don't bother with frank n stiff . the best we can do is just ignore him. much like the morg watch site he will create a backgroung ,claim to want to help us and systematically set about destroying any credible work being done. just ignore him people. if he had any real proof about what he has been spouting off about he would have offered it by now. the best way to negate him is to ignore his post and not respond to him period. i was willing to give randy the benefit of the doubt until now but her failure to distance herself from this character speakes volumes for her as well. this is my last post having to do with either of them. i hope you guys will do the same. don't give them any more time or energy. let them bark at themselves
ppy1818
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 3:00 am

Postby standby » Wed Jan 10, 2007 6:10 pm

Frank,

It is all to clear why you have devoted so much of your time to this site. I don't believe your association originates with morgellonswatch although you exude the same intelligence and mentality and use some of the same tactics.

You are focused on promoting the sole efforts of ONE individual yet fail or refuse to see or address the very actions that prevent them from achieving the goals they wish to achieve. You are a designated advocat for an individual with a 'history' of distruction resulting in disassociation. You find enjoyment and gratification in what you think you have accomplished by your contributions.

What ever your relationship really is whether personal or professional, you have succeeded in blowning your own cover and further inhibited the one you advocate for a much needed cause.

Realisticly you have achieved nothing here except boosting your ego.
User avatar
standby
Death Adder
Death Adder
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 6:43 pm

Postby Frank N Stein » Wed Jan 10, 2007 6:18 pm

Sabrina wrote:Do you have any proof about your theory on tamtam?


OK, that’s a fair question. Let’s look at what is considered as proof in objective scientific analysis. In logical and scientific analysis, a known object of study is observed and measured for data which define a set characteristics, which in turn support a conclusion. There are many sets of observation which are considered valid. Not all data sets are composed of visible data.

An example of this is atomic observation. No one has seen an atom. Yet we know it exists because of its behavioral characteristics. We know how atoms behave, and therefore draw conclusions based upon their behavior. If one group of atoms behave in one manner, and another group behaves in another manner, we can then categorize them by their behavioral characteristics. We can’t see atoms, but we know from the data characteristics that they display what they are, and how they will effect our environment.

Tam Tam can be evaluated in the same manner. Once again here is a set of known data that defines the conclusions that I have made about Tam Tam.

1) Tam Tam composed an elaborate thesis, but failed to validate it with requested data for over a year. A logical conclusion is that he may be lying, and therefore has no data to support his thesis.
2) Tam Tam operated a very expensive, high bandwidth, web site with no visible means of paying the bill. When questioned about this, Tam Tam stated that he has received funding from investors in the “French Nose & Co.” investment company which does not exist. A logical conclusion is that Tam Tam is once again lying, and that he is making money to pay his bill from some other source.
3) Tam Tam’s web site used a very professional, and expensive video presentation to capture a target audience, and led them to believe that he had identified the source of their problem, but did not disclose what the source was. The web page then invited the audience to create a “user login” where it is assumed that the audience will gain greater site privileges, and be given more information. After submitting the personal information, the audience finds that there are no more privileges or information beyond that which has already been given on the first and only page. A logical conclusion is that Tam Tam is using the video presentation to lure people to submit personal information, which he compiles and sells to data mining companies at a profit.

Now there is your data which is acceptable by scientific methodology. These three simple sets of data lead to a conclusion that Tam Tam is nothing more than a common spammer based upon behavioral characteristics. To reach a different conclusion, you would have to include different data. Tam Tam has been asked to provide data which would offset the balance of data displayed here, but has refused to do so.

Now I have answered your question by basing my conclusion upon scientific methodology.

Now I have a question for you, and will continue to ask this same question of you until you provide a valid answer that is also based upon scientific methodology.

Sabrina, what data can you provide that will indicate that Tam Tam is a valid microbiological researcher who has discovered that the source of the morgellons infection is a man made bacterium, that forms intelligent proteins within us, and is assembling insect parts within our bodies?

We will each go one question at a time here, and will not proceed to the next question until each has submitted a valid, objective answer. This is the biology-online.org scientific forum, not the USA Today entertainment forum.
Frank N Stein
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 350
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 3:18 pm

Postby Frank N Stein » Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:01 pm

I'm going to make a prediction here that the Tam aliases are going to attack my methodology and/or data, rather than provide data that would support a different conclusion. I don't know,,,I guess I'm just feeling psychic.
Frank N Stein
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 350
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 3:18 pm

Postby DS » Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:44 pm

I am feeling that you are a #1, grade A, asshole. This will remain as fact whether you are correct about tamtam, or not.
DS
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 3:05 am

Postby Frank N Stein » Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:51 pm

DS wrote:I am feeling that you are a #1, grade A, asshole. This will remain as fact whether you are correct about tamtam, or not.


Well I guess that I was wrong. The Tam Scam aliases attacked me personlly instead.

Damn......and I was just entertaining the thought of starting a 1-800 psychic line.
Frank N Stein
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 350
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 3:18 pm

Postby al » Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:52 pm

Yea Frank, ya tool, you have applied very subtle influences, but your tactics stand out like dogs balls. Frank, I hate to state the obvious, but you are not wanted, are vehemently disliked, and, to concur with DS, your'e a#1 A grade asshole.

Piss off Frank
al
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:30 am

Postby al » Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:54 pm

Cranky Franky, we DONT need your help.
Go help the save the numbat fund.
al
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:30 am

PreviousNext

Return to Human Biology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron