Generation of DNA nucleotides

[JackBean]

There's limitation of the resolution. Trust me, easier would be to do real-time electron microscope or NMR of such complicated mix.

[gs99]

Those who invent and discover seem to go beyond "limitations":
Years ago, the staff at Bell labs discovered a way to have more than one conversation on a telephone wire!
I have a complete motion picture stored on a small piece of plastic; I can play it on a computer at home!

At this point, it seems we need a "microscope" that can see what's happening in the molecules of a live specimen.

I don't know about you, but I surely cannot predetermine the technologies.

But somewhere, a genius will get the insight.

[mith]

you do understand that since we can't create energy out of nothing(law of conservation) that even in the future, we wouldn't be able to create energy ?

this isn't a technology issue, it's a limit of physics.

[gs99]

You're saying we have reached our limit of learning and developing new things?

Haven't we been at this crossroads before?

Don't worry that we don't have the answer right now; it will come.
And the law of conservation will not be broken.

[JackBean]

any of us is saying, that we reached limit of all learning, just that some things are a little behind the Universe laws as we know them nowadays...

[gs99]

any of us is saying, that we reached limit of all learning

What does "any of us is saying" mean?
More sensible (to me): "None of us are saying that we reached limit of all learning".

some things are a little behind the Universe laws as we know them nowadays...

If you mean "current microscope technology is lagging a little behind",
I agree.

The answer probably will be in quantum physics, for example:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 172255.htm