Login

|
|
Inter species breeding with fertile offspringModerator: BioTeam
35 posts • Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
sorry there is no proof that the laws of physic will be the same tommorrow as they are today just like there is no proof that you will be alive tomorrow both are based on faith no one can look into the future
So tomorrow gravity could no function?
Wow. Tomorrow all the planets in the solar system could be flung out of their orbits. Gamila, are you serious? Or is this a joke. The man of science has learned to believe in justification, not by faith, but by verification.
Thomas H. Huxley (1825-95) English biologist.
there is no proof that any of that will happen tommrow if there is please give us that proof and tell us who proved it
it has been shown in another thread that harmful genes are being transmitted when NS says they should be become rare but in fact they are common thus showing NS is wrong go read the threads about15939.html about15762.html better still go read colin leslie dean refutation of NS http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/bo ... ection.pdf THE REFUTATION EVOLUTIONARY THEORY: NATURAL SELECTION SHOWN TO BE WRONG
And now your going to ask for sources into my obvious sarcasm. OMG The man of science has learned to believe in justification, not by faith, but by verification.
Thomas H. Huxley (1825-95) English biologist.
Re: Inter species breeding with fertile offspringgamila is a forum-troller, he just posts stupid **** and contradicts people in every way.
but if you are asking for a theory and who proved it, i believe it was newton originally http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitation and then later evidenced in apollo 15 by David Scott, with the hammer and the feather, although you are certainly too young to remember that go do something with ur life gamila
all that showed was that at the time of the experiments the laws of physics where the same but they dont prove that the laws of physics will be the same tommorow no one can look into the future
Re:ok im allready scared about 2012 you dont need to scare me more
Postmodernism and its follower like C.L Dean and the fawning airhead admirer (or alias for self-agrandization and massive stupidity evidenced by 3rd person self-reference) are way scarier that hypothetical end of of the world build by poorly educated conspiration theorist that cannot grasp the complicated working of positional counting.
Patrick
Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without any proof. (Ashley Montague)
Re: Inter species breeding with fertile offspringI think you are putting away something important for the speciation definition, even more important from the evolutionary point of view than from taxonomical one. non-fertile offspring is not the only barrier for interspecifical breeding. Ecological habitat, phisical barriers, sexual behavior, and a lot of other things are also important. Bactrian and common camel are barely if any inhabitating the same ecological region, I think, so interbreeding is naturally avoided. So they can have fertile offspring, so what? They are still segregated populations in a specie-commited evolutionary pathway. The same with the two horse species. In categories Iike specie I likely to be Abelardian, they not exist by itself, but reflects real differences, agrupped by the mind in logical boxes, not arbitrary ones.
35 posts • Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests |
© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy