Discussion of everything related to the Theory of Evolution.
you seem to end in paradox at each new attempt to refute dean
so populations are made up of individuals-which reproduce
so the populations evolves this means two things
1) we have a population of things evolve into a population of birds, and so do the the individual things evolve into individual birds
ie we have a population of birds and individual birds
so if individual things evolve into individual birds then we have the dean paradox
or the paradox
2) we have a population of things evolve into a population of birds but the individuals are not birds
so this one muttion produced the first bird
so what did this first bird mate with
mutiple mutations accoured at the same time so whe have point 2
Once again, I spoke too soon. You keep playing stupid word games, responding to only parts of my post (not even full sentences), and repeating yourself, Colin. And no, you are not an authority, so stop quoting yourself in the third person. /thread.
Cain paradox in the Bible? There is no such thing, the Bible does not say that Adam and Eve had no other children, and even though they were related, the bloodlines would have been purer than now.
"The scientific establishment bears a grisly resemblance to the Spanish Inquisition"-D. Gould
I have no love for you. But avoid gamila. This is not a creationist, nor an evolutionist, just a post-modernist of the worst kind for whom reality is just an artifact of our perception. His/her only goal was to promote his/her silly book published by a vanity press in australia. S/he is not interested in listening waht other have to say, and do not care. S/he is of such abysmal selfcenterd and egotistical stupidity that I would rather all of the landoverbaptist forums than one more post of Gamila so I will lock this thread to keep that monster out. Not for you, you are free to spew your ignorance in the rest of the forum, but not here.
"Here be dragons" and I do not want to wake them up.
Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests