Login

Join for Free!
116893 members


Natural selection wrong due to cambrian explosion

Discussion of everything related to the Theory of Evolution.

Moderator: BioTeam

Re:

Postby telanerv » Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:55 pm

gamila wrote:i have none
fact is though natural selection is shown to be wrong by colin leslie dean



YOU HAVE NO ALTERNATE EXPLANATION

COLIN LESLIE DEAN IS A PHILOSPHER
COLIN LESLIE DEAN HAS NO EXPLANATION, AND HAS NO EVIDENCE
COLIN LESLIE DEAN IS A MASTER OF THE MANIPULATION OF THE HUMAN MIND AS ARE YOU
COLIN LESLIE DEAN USES WORDS NOT EXPERIMENTS

leave these forums u troll

=youlosegameovergoodtrykthanksbye
telanerv
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:53 pm

Postby AstusAleator » Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:55 am

telanerv wrote:COLIN LESLIE DEAN IS A MASTER OF THE MANIPULATION OF THE HUMAN MIND AS ARE YOU


That's going way too far. You're giving him/her waaay too much credit. It's pretty clear that zero minds have been manipulated here - at least of those who post. Everyone seems to see him/her pretty clearly for what he/she is.
What did the parasitic Candiru fish say when it finally found a host? - - "Urethra!!"
User avatar
AstusAleator
King Cobra
King Cobra
 
Posts: 1039
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:51 pm
Location: Oregon, USA

Re: Natural selection wrong due to cambrian explosion

Postby AFJ » Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:45 pm

I agree, Mr. Astus. How can you think that because something has a "problem" that it becomes irrelevant or meaninglessness. I'm not a philosopher, but obviously philosophy would have problems and unanswerable questions i.e. what is life? Does that mean it is not a field of study?
AFJ
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:59 pm


Postby AstusAleator » Wed Jul 29, 2009 2:43 am

Mr. AFJ that's a great point.
Behold his own logic used against him!

philosophy is proven wrong by paradoxical and contradicting views
therefore
philosophers and philosophy are just meaningless nonsense
therefore
CLD is irrelevant in every possible way

In a nutshell, the only reason people respond to gamila is to try to show him how horribly irrelevant the things he's saying are.
What did the parasitic Candiru fish say when it finally found a host? - - "Urethra!!"
User avatar
AstusAleator
King Cobra
King Cobra
 
Posts: 1039
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:51 pm
Location: Oregon, USA

Postby gamila » Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:00 am

philosophy is proven wrong by paradoxical and contradicting views
therefore
philosophers and philosophy are just meaningless nonsense


hahaah
biology is proven wrong by paradoxical and contradicting views
therefore
biologists and biology are just meaningless nonsense

biologists tell us that the bactrian camel and the dromardry camel are two different species
but
they can interbreed which should mean they are the same species
but we are told they are different species
thus the notion of species ends in contradiction ie meaninglessness

a beautiful example of colin leslie dean point


hahaha
mathematics is proven wrong by paradoxical and contradicting views
therefore
mathematicians and mathematics are just meaningless nonsense


from colin leslie dean
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/bo ... nality.pdf

As Bunch states: “None of them [paradoxes] has been resolved by thinking the way mathematicians thought until the end of the nineteenth century. To get around them requires some reformulation of mathematics. Most reformulations except for axiomatic set theory, results in the loss of mathematical ideas and results that have proven to be extremely useful. Axiomatic set theory explicitly eliminates the known paradoxes, but cannot be shown to be consistent. Therefore, other paradoxes can occur at any time [i.e. the Skolem paradox].”




haha


scienceis proven wrong by paradoxical and contradicting views
therefore
scientists and science are just meaningless nonsense
In regard to the paradoxes and contradictions of quantum theory Wick state the orthodox view when he says “here my opinion of the orthodox quantum mechanics, like Bohr, comes down to the meaning of words. “Classical” and “complementarity”, insult and commendation, are euphemisms; the belief concealed is that Nature has been found in a contradiction. But quantum physicists are not simpletons. In their hearts they know such a claim is philosophically unacceptable and would be rejected in other sciences.”
Wick notes “ I believe orthodox quantum theorists [slates] reason, consciously or unconsciously, something like this. The microscopic world exhibits paradoxes or contradictions and this fact is reflected in the best theory describing it.


http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/bo ... ience4.pdf

The absurdities or meaninglessness of mathematics and science: paradoxes and contradiction in mathematics and science which makes them meaningless, mathematics and science are examples of mythical thought, case study of the meaninglessness of all views
gamila
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 12:20 pm

Re: Natural selection wrong due to cambrian explosion

Postby AstusAleator » Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:48 am

But what are words if not the tools of philosophy and science, so words must be meaningless nonsense too!!

garmic fanduf melup ic sharn tag!

I nominate gamila for Philosopher King of the Universe!! It'll be great, we'll all become nihilistic and live in caves.
What did the parasitic Candiru fish say when it finally found a host? - - "Urethra!!"
User avatar
AstusAleator
King Cobra
King Cobra
 
Posts: 1039
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:51 pm
Location: Oregon, USA

Re: Natural selection wrong due to cambrian explosion

Postby LeoPol » Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:06 am

Eye with pupil of an eye and lens of the eye appeared before cambrian explosion

http://translate.google.ru/translate?hl ... ge_id%3D82
User avatar
LeoPol
Death Adder
Death Adder
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:49 am
Location: Ukraine, Kiev

Re: Natural selection wrong due to cambrian explosion

Postby EASTstroudsburg13 » Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:35 pm

If all of those are meaningless nonsense what isn't? And if science is meaningless nonsense why waste your time posting theories why natural selection is wrong when the entire subject, according to you, is meaningless anyway? :|
Science rules! :D

"Nothing says 'oops' like a wall of flame." -Marion Winik

Go Phillies!
Go Eagles!
User avatar
EASTstroudsburg13
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:52 pm
Location: East Stroudsburg, PA

Postby LeoPol » Fri Sep 18, 2009 7:27 am

I am looking for the truth. This is my hobby. And if in the theory of natural selection has made a small mistake (which, however, compromises the science), then it must be corrected. :|
User avatar
LeoPol
Death Adder
Death Adder
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:49 am
Location: Ukraine, Kiev

Re: Natural selection wrong due to cambrian explosion

Postby EASTstroudsburg13 » Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:53 pm

gamila wrote:hahaah
biology is proven wrong by paradoxical and contradicting views
therefore
biologists and biology are just meaningless nonsense

hahaha
mathematics is proven wrong by paradoxical and contradicting views
therefore
mathematicians and mathematics are just meaningless nonsense

scienceis proven wrong by paradoxical and contradicting views
therefore
scientists and science are just meaningless nonsense

The absurdities or meaninglessness of mathematics and science: paradoxes and contradiction in mathematics and science which makes them meaningless, mathematics and science are examples of mythical thought, case study of the meaninglessness of all views

I meant him. If he believes this, than he has no real motive for constantly pressing that natural selection is wrong. I for one don't believe that science is meaningless, but according to him, it is, so in theory, he doesn't really care, so why should he bother?
Science rules! :D

"Nothing says 'oops' like a wall of flame." -Marion Winik

Go Phillies!
Go Eagles!
User avatar
EASTstroudsburg13
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:52 pm
Location: East Stroudsburg, PA

Postby gamila » Wed Oct 28, 2009 12:41 pm

The fossil evidence of the pre cambrian explosion shows darwin theory is wrong

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ediacaran#Biota
The Ediacaran biota include the oldest definite multicellular organisms with tissues, and the most common types resemble segmented worms, fronds, disks, or immobile bags. They bear little resemblance to modern lifeforms, and their relationship even with the later lifeforms of the Cambrian explosion is difficult to interpret.
gamila
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 12:20 pm

Postby LeoPol » Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:42 am

I think most of all Ediacaran biota - developed turbellarian. Very similar in morphology to modern Turbellaria. Even some modern turbellarian have full eyes with pupils and lens, but what then talk about the era when turbellarian with their incredible regenerative capacity dominated the planet?

http://translate.google.com/translate?j ... ry_state0=


On the relations between the Ediacaran turbellarians and those of them that have developed in the late biota - bryozoans, polychaetes and their derivatives, can fantasize. So I try to do so on behalf of the fantastic character - Pikaia from the early Cambrian, which happened in our time!

http://translate.google.com/translate?j ... ry_state0=
User avatar
LeoPol
Death Adder
Death Adder
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:49 am
Location: Ukraine, Kiev

Previous

Return to Evolution

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron