Login

|
|
sir2 and sch9 are good genes or not?Moderator: BioTeam
3 posts • Page 1 of 1
sir2 and sch9 are good genes or not?some said if you knock out them, you can liver longer.
some said they are good, if u get one more copy of sir2, you can live longer. which is right? *_ *
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/a ... /5487/2126
More is better, according to the abstract. I can't read the whole article. I'm sure my university subscribes to science, I just don't know how to access the subscription. "I have no intention of stopping anytime soon. I want to understand the universe and answer the big questions, that is what keeps me going" - Stephen Hawking
sir2 (SIRT1) in mammals is a "longlivety gene" in mimics the effect of calorie restriction (which leads to longlivety) and protects from a variety of disorders. SIRT1 KO mice are very, very sick and die at the age of a few weeks (a year with special diet and conditions). So, yes more is better.
And I'm working on it... "When In Danger Or In Doubt Run In Circles Scream And Shout"
Lawrence J. Peter
3 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy
Science Network - Braintrack.com - University Directory | Chemicool.com - Chemistry | Logo design by LogoBee | Powered by phpBB