Login

Join for Free!
17709 members


Template Re-annealing Problem

Discussion of all aspects of biological molecules, biochemical processes and laboratory procedures in the field.

Moderator: BioTeam

Template Re-annealing Problem

Postby Navin on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:33 am

In PCR, after the denaturation step, and then the temaperature is lowered to around 60 degrees celcius for the annealing of the primers,

Why is it that the 2 template strands do not re-anneal?

This question came out in my exam and some of the available options were;
A. The primer is small
B. 60 degrees celcius is too high for the template to reanneal
C. The primer concentration is high

The thing is - all those options seem plausible to me. What do you reckon?
Botany is the study of what? Bottoms!
User avatar
Navin
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: Singapore (Asia Pacific)

Postby MrMistery on Sat Nov 24, 2007 2:02 pm

i would go with B, through elimination:
A is true. So? It does not actually offer an explanation
C is also true. Not only it does not offer an explanation, but also is very ambiguous: high compared to what?
"I have no intention of stopping anytime soon. I want to understand the universe and answer the big questions, that is what keeps me going" - Stephen Hawking
User avatar
MrMistery
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 6097
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Romania(small and unimportant country)

Postby mith on Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:04 pm

C is probably the right answer you only have 2 template strands while your primer concentration is much much higher throughout the process.
Living one day at a time;
Enjoying one moment at a time;
Accepting hardships as the pathway to peace;
~Niebuhr
User avatar
mith
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 4629
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 8:14 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA

Postby canalon on Sat Nov 24, 2007 7:39 pm

C is the answer. In fact the huge excess of primer compared o template is the limiting step of the PCR. When too many primers have been used the eficiency drops dramatically.
Patrick

Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)
User avatar
canalon
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 2553
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: Canada

Postby MrMistery on Sat Nov 24, 2007 8:37 pm

i was thinking C might be, but then I thought that the relative concentrations change through the process and it still works just as fine. But now i remember that i've read that the efficiency drops sharply after 30 cycles. My bad
But cut me some slack, as i said the answer choices are strangely presented
"I have no intention of stopping anytime soon. I want to understand the universe and answer the big questions, that is what keeps me going" - Stephen Hawking
User avatar
MrMistery
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 6097
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Romania(small and unimportant country)

Postby mith on Sat Nov 24, 2007 11:36 pm

Helps if you've worked in a lab :)
Living one day at a time;
Enjoying one moment at a time;
Accepting hardships as the pathway to peace;
~Niebuhr
User avatar
mith
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 4629
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 8:14 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA


Postby Navin on Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:36 am

Thanks!

Yep, i guess C is the limiting step.

In fact - I have done PCR many times - but i didnt question what limited the number of steps! Well, I guess it just pays to be extra inquisitive.
Botany is the study of what? Bottoms!
User avatar
Navin
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: Singapore (Asia Pacific)

Postby canalon on Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:00 am

MrMistery wrote: But now i remember that i've read that the efficiency drops sharply after 30 cycles. My bad
But cut me some slack, as i said the answer choices are strangely presented


Not necessarily true, it also depends on the amount of starting material. With low amounts you might need more han 30 cycles to enter the limiting step. But then the enzyme is also losing some efficiency... which can be a pain when trying to detect low amount of DNA in qPCR
Patrick

Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)
User avatar
canalon
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 2553
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: Canada

Postby MrMistery on Tue Nov 27, 2007 7:52 pm

obviously the book was listing an average case
"I have no intention of stopping anytime soon. I want to understand the universe and answer the big questions, that is what keeps me going" - Stephen Hawking
User avatar
MrMistery
Inland Taipan
Inland Taipan
 
Posts: 6097
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Romania(small and unimportant country)


Return to Molecular Biology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests