Discussion of everything related to the Theory of Evolution.
Again with the insults...
Instead of trying to bully people on a forum, try engaging in actually theoretically conversation. Otherwise, stop wasting other peoples time.
It's people like you, Jorge, that make forums like this one a bad taste.
Again - an opinion based on igorarnce is garbage abd a classic waster of time in a science forum. You need to understand science before holding forth with your sophomoric interpretation. I gave you the opportunity and provided direction that would give you some basic knowledge of marvelous concept of science and you rejected it - whining that it's bullying. I'm not one of you folks or useless teachers who think your spirited but ignorant comments are cute - I'm a scientist.
Your whining demand that ignorance be appreciated represents the continued failure of our educuational system. Again - wikipedia has a good discussion of scientific theory that describes the unique cincept and differentiates it well from the common concept of theory. Evolution is a theory and in science thery hs great weight. If you do nothing else (other than feel sorry for yourself) please read the description.
Jorge, you need to calm down. I didn't disagree that evolution isn't a theory. I know what a theory is. You don't have to try and degrade me with comments like "Childish" and "sophomoric" in an attempt to make yourself seem superior over the internet. No one is trying to harm your scientific analysis of this philosophical themed thread.
jorge you should improve your pronunciation of your written English before calling others ignorant because I put much in doubt that you are scientist. if you do not like the article dont call it a silly and instead give an opinion where is wrong and offer your evidence about it that creation is more solid than evolution. I will gladly give you my opinion on the matter.
This is not an oral forum, it is written. Therefore chllenging pronunciation of written english displays "ignorance." Ignorance is not a perjorative term - it merely says you don't know what you're talking about. This has been the case with odinraven and you (likely the same person). Unlike your other persona, I hope you hve learned something from our exchange.
and what are your qualifications? Certainly not an english major.
You are simply ignorant, but that can change. Have you yet sought out the defintion of scientific theory or has your intellectual cowardice driven you to permanent ignorance?
I'll repeat the points you chose to ignore. Evolution is a scientific theory. Theories in science are not casual concepts (not, as you offered, everybody has a theory), they describe the prevailing concept among scientists that explain a body of phenomena. Such theories are testable and falsifiable among other characteristic. Falsifiable is not time limited - it was, is and will be possible that additional data and observations, other theories not yet offered, etc. may lead the scientifc community away from the concept. So it is not "airtight" (not a scientifc term in any case and certainly not so by your sophomoric post), it is again the previling theory at this time among scientists to explain relevant phenmena.
Further, evolution does not negate the existence of God nor God the theory of evolution (even if there were a deity-based creation). Evolution does not speak to the beginning of life, only to change after its initiation. God is not a scientific thery as it is untestable - those who accept it do so on belief.
Now try to grow up and think - and stop whining like a child.
first of all jorge I never stated that god does not exist and I am quite aware that the theory of evolution and the theory of the begin of life is quite another matter. never said that evolution is a fact I just posted a "quote " I like of somebody that consider it a fact. since you can clearly see that I support evolution instead of the ID theory that most likely you support that implied in the way you responded to my post and Odins ( two separate persons).
I am a Lift and escalator technician that does not implied I am ignorant or that you teach me anything since at the end you refrain from putting your point of view and only focus in being a critic of the most accepted theory and refrain from showing how your ID theory has a better evidence or any other theory for that matter.
note: PHD does not mean that you can treat people like dirt or act all superior and this web page is for biology online in general not a PHD only post learn a bit of humility instead of being arrogant
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests