
|
|
Anthropogenic global warming?Moderator: BioTeam Of course global warming is anthropogenic. There, the question is solved.
What did the parasitic Candiru fish say when it finally found a host? - - "Urethra!!"
Good. So we can ramble aimlessly now?
Generally speaking, the more people talk about "being saved," the further away they actually are from true salvation.
~Alex #2 Total Post Count
It's always fun to make a point and then stray momentarily in a different direction... I agree though. It's more likely global warming is caused by humans.
J o n e s i e
A question that sometimes drives me hazy: am I or are the others crazy? -Albert Einstein
I honestly don't know what else could be causing it, unless God is for some reason seriously pissed off and He's trying to fry us.
Generally speaking, the more people talk about "being saved," the further away they actually are from true salvation.
~Alex #2 Total Post Count
Alternative solutions that were proposed were:
- sun spots - natural climate cycles - and a few others hat I don't remember. Not that I agree with those, eh Patrick
Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without any proof. (Ashley Montague)
The planet seems to have a homeostatic mechanism which is the Gulf Stream. That is to say, the warm air that circulates in the Atlantic is a function of the Gulf Stream, as global temps rise, the glaciers in Greenland melt, this causes the salt of the Atlantic to drop, and hence the Gulf Stream warm air loop is decreased. Since the Gulf Stream lowers, temps in the Atlantic drops, in turn the glaciers begin to reform.
Now the question is, can man create such an extreme as to break this loop. I dunno, and I am sure that no one can say for sure. My thinking is that homeostasis is a loop, thusly cyclic. It is clear that man has affected this naturally running loop. I would consider mans affect as a variable in the damping factor of the loop equation. Even a over or under damped loop will eventually reach equilibrium, but the oscillation within the loop is what should be of concern, and seems to correlate directly with mankind’s intervention.
I think that deserves to be quoted in the Member Quotes thread.
Generally speaking, the more people talk about "being saved," the further away they actually are from true salvation.
~Alex #2 Total Post Count
Seriously? This is how this thread died? Well fear not Michael, I'll reply - almost a year later. (This was just before the big "crash" of January '08 so no surprise it's drifted off into oblivion)
What makes you think that the so-called homeostatic system is so reliable as to keep our climate relatively stable? If it is, then what were those ancient ice-ages all about? What did the parasitic Candiru fish say when it finally found a host? - - "Urethra!!"
I think the controversy is not so much that our climate should be stable but that humans are throwing it seriously out of whack from where it should be.
Generally speaking, the more people talk about "being saved," the further away they actually are from true salvation.
~Alex #2 Total Post Count
It's the cows I tellz ya. All that methane.
What did the parasitic Candiru fish say when it finally found a host? - - "Urethra!!"
And don't forget Mexico, with all of their re-fried beans.
Generally speaking, the more people talk about "being saved," the further away they actually are from true salvation.
~Alex #2 Total Post Count
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy
Science Network - Braintrack.com - University Directory | Chemicool.com - Chemistry | Logo design by LogoBee | Powered by phpBB