Anthropogenic global warming?

[JorgeLobo]

Poor alex - still whining. Dishonest? Obviously you are.

[alextemplet]

Care to explain how so?

[JorgeLobo]

So we'll obtuse to your characteristics.

[futurezoologist]

My input on original question:
If the world has drooped so low as to look to a politician (whos greatest achievement was coming second to George Bush) for complex scientific evidence then i think that it will take far too much effort to bring these people back to level headedness so i refuse to supply evidence on this issue and i am simply going to say the earth is far too complex to have its future predicted by simple computer models, the earth has warmed and cooled thousands of times before any human existed and finally that only politicians and greenies believe in anthropogenic global warming.
As a great man once said:
"I have no data yet. It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories instead of theories to suit facts."
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930), Sherlock Holmes

[EDIT]
Just read back 2 pages of aggressive argument (which wasnt even argument, i would call it mindless blabber) and i must say i originally assumed as i saw the topic that there would be hot headedness. To both argumentees/teams: Step 1 STOP Step 2 First party Provides Their Evidence. (evidence is not 'polar ice caps are melting', it is, say, images from a reliable source showing consecutive images over a period at which global warming could take place, say 300 years, 1 photo every 10 years at the same time of year, now that would be solid evidence[i know cameras wernt available 300 years ago]) Step 3 The second debater provides their evidence to rebut this argument or will simply say ' no firm evidence provided'. If evidence is unable to be rebutted second debater will simply say "one point to you". Now move to step 4 Step 4 Second debater then provides argument point and the cycle continues.

Please PM me in 2020 when argument is finished with final scores.

[JorgeLobo]

agree - global warming is policy not science