Login

Join for Free!
116825 members


Anthropogenic global warming?

Discussion of the distribution and abundance of living organisms and how these properties are affected by interactions between the organisms and their environment

Moderator: BioTeam

Postby JorgeLobo » Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:16 am

Poor alex - still whining. Dishonest? Obviously you are.
JorgeLobo
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:12 am

Postby alextemplet » Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:21 am

Care to explain how so?
Generally speaking, the more people talk about "being saved," the further away they actually are from true salvation.

~Alex
#2 Total Post Count
User avatar
alextemplet
King Cobra
King Cobra
 
Posts: 5599
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 4:50 pm
Location: South Louisiana (aka Cajun Country)

Postby JorgeLobo » Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:44 am

So we'll obtuse to your characteristics.
JorgeLobo
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:12 am


Postby futurezoologist » Fri Feb 20, 2009 12:55 pm

My input on original question:
If the world has drooped so low as to look to a politician (whos greatest achievement was coming second to George Bush) for complex scientific evidence then i think that it will take far too much effort to bring these people back to level headedness so i refuse to supply evidence on this issue and i am simply going to say the earth is far too complex to have its future predicted by simple computer models, the earth has warmed and cooled thousands of times before any human existed and finally that only politicians and greenies believe in anthropogenic global warming.
As a great man once said:
"I have no data yet. It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories instead of theories to suit facts."
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930), Sherlock Holmes

[EDIT]
Just read back 2 pages of aggressive argument (which wasnt even argument, i would call it mindless blabber) and i must say i originally assumed as i saw the topic that there would be hot headedness. To both argumentees/teams: Step 1 STOP Step 2 First party Provides Their Evidence. (evidence is not 'polar ice caps are melting', it is, say, images from a reliable source showing consecutive images over a period at which global warming could take place, say 300 years, 1 photo every 10 years at the same time of year, now that would be solid evidence[i know cameras wernt available 300 years ago]) Step 3 The second debater provides their evidence to rebut this argument or will simply say ' no firm evidence provided'. If evidence is unable to be rebutted second debater will simply say "one point to you". Now move to step 4 Step 4 Second debater then provides argument point and the cycle continues.

Please PM me in 2020 when argument is finished with final scores. :wink:
A wise man once said to me:
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

Only the fittest chickens cross the road.
User avatar
futurezoologist
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Western Australia

Postby JorgeLobo » Sat Feb 21, 2009 1:00 am

agree - global warming is policy not science
JorgeLobo
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:12 am

Re:

Postby Crucible » Tue Oct 04, 2011 11:49 pm

JorgeLobo wrote:Poor alex - always whining. You see, I KNOW the subject. You do NOT know the subject. Understand the difference? The pity is that you insist on sharing your ignorance with the expectation of praise.
Indeed.
Crucible
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 3:46 am

Re:

Postby Crucible » Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:30 am

futurezoologist wrote:My input on original question:
If the world has drooped so low as to look to a politician (whos greatest achievement was coming second to George Bush) for complex scientific evidence
Would you believe... "High School Physics" ?

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/james ... ing-shock/

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/09/28/v ... xperiment/



... i think that it will take far too much effort to bring these people back to level headedness
Back ? Whaddya mean "back" ?

In 2011 there is a mini Ice Age threat for Europe..instead of the 2000 "No more snow for children ever" threat.
Crucible
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 3:46 am

Postby Crucible » Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:30 pm

OK, this should put a damper on the pathetic Suzukian mewling morons, the self-chastized "climate criminals".

Look at who is emitting more CO2...it's the backward countries nearer the equator and China as well, of course...Canada and North-Eastern USA and Europe, are GREEN. Australia is a little bit bad..it's half naughty.

http://www.suite101.com/news/new-satell ... ry-a394975

The third world owes us reparations money. Madagascar is a CO2 demon that needs to be tamed.
Crucible
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 3:46 am

Re: Anthropogenic global warming?

Postby Crucible » Tue Nov 01, 2011 7:58 pm

Sorry the link provided changed.
Here is a link to the article from Japan
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/30_13.html.
Crucible
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 3:46 am

Previous

Return to Ecology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron