The authors have demonstrated that a short, all-atom minimization with fixed C&…

• Abstract
• Background
• Results and discussion
• Conclusion
• Methods
• References
• Figures
• Tables

Biology Articles » Methods & Techniques » Towards the high-resolution protein structure prediction. Fast refinement of reduced models with all-atom force field » References

References

- Towards the high-resolution protein structure prediction. Fast refinement of reduced models with all-atom force field

1.   Schueler-Furman O, Wang C, Bradley P, Misura K, Baker D: Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions.Science 2005, 310(5748):638-642.         2.   Bradley P, Misura KM, Baker D: Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins.Science 2005, 309(5742):1868-1871.         3.   Nilges M, Brunger AT: Automated modeling of coiled coils: application to the GCN4 dimerization region.Protein engineering 1991, 4(6):649-659.         4.   Vieth M, Kolinski A, Brooks CL 3rd, Skolnick J: Prediction of the folding pathways and structure of the GCN4 leucine zipper.Journal of molecular biology 1994, 237(4):361-367.         5.   Simmerling C, Lee MR, Ortiz AR, Kolinski A, Skolnick J, Kollman PA: Combining MONSSTER and LES/PME to Predict Protein Structure from Amino Acid Sequence: Application to the Small Protein CMTI-1.J Am Chem Soc 2000, 122(35):8392 -88402.         6.   Sippl MJ: Knowledge-based potentials for proteins.Current opinion in structural biology 1995, 5(2):229-235.         7.   Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL: Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading.Journal of molecular biology 1996, 256(3):623-644.         8.   Lee MR, Tsai J, Baker D, Kollman PA: Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structure prediction.Journal of molecular biology 2001, 313(2):417-430.         9.   Dominy BN, Brooks CL: Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials.J Comput Chem 2002, 23(1):147-160.         10.   Feig M, Brooks CL 3rd: Evaluating CASP4 predictions with physical energy functions.Proteins 2002, 49(2):232-245.         11.   Gront D, Hansmann UH, Kolinski A: Exploring protein energy landscapes with hierarchical clustering.Int J Quantum Chem 2005, 105(6):826-830.         12.   Eramian D, Shen MY, Devos D, Melo F, Sali A, Marti-Renom MA: A composite score for predicting errors in protein structure models.Protein Sci 2006, 15(7):1653-1666.         13.   Jones DT: GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences.Journal of molecular biology 1999, 287(4):797-815.         14.   Wallner B, Elofsson A: Can correct protein models be identified?Protein Sci 2003, 12(5):1073-1086.         15.   Fan H, Mark AE: Refinement of homology-based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques.Protein Sci 2004, 13(1):211-220.         16.   Xia Y, Huang ES, Levitt M, Samudrala R: Ab initio construction of protein tertiary structures using a hierarchical approach.Journal of molecular biology 2000, 300(1):171-185.         17.   Kolinski A: Protein modeling and structure prediction with a reduced representation.Acta biochimica Polonica 2004, 51(2):349-371.         18.   Kolinski A, Bujnicki JM: Generalized protein structure prediction based on combination of fold-recognition with de novo folding and evaluation of models.Proteins 2005, 61:84-90.         19.   CASP6 Home page[http://predictioncenter.org/casp6/]         20.   Sali A, Blundell TL: Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints.Journal of molecular biology 1993, 234(3):779-815.         21.   Gront D, Kmiecik S, Kolinski A: Backbone building from quadrilaterals: A fast and accurate algorithm for protein backbone reconstruction from alpha carbon coordinates.J Comput Chem 2007, 28(9):1593-1597.         22.   Park B, Levitt M: Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys.Journal of molecular biology 1996, 258(2):367-392.         23.   Park BH, Huang ES, Levitt M: Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds.Journal of molecular biology 1997, 266(4):831-846.         24.   Lazaridis T, Karplus M: Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation.Journal of molecular biology 1999, 288(3):477-487.         25.   Vorobjev YN, Almagro JC, Hermans J: Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS, a new method for calculating conformational free energy that uses both dynamics simulations with an explicit solvent and an implicit solvent continuum model.Proteins 1998, 32(4):399-413.         26.   Claessens M, Van Cutsem E, Lasters I, Wodak S: Modelling the polypeptide backbone with 'spare parts' from known protein structures.Protein engineering 1989, 2(5):335-345.         27.   Case DA Pearlman, D.A., Caldwell, J.W., Cheatham,T.E. III, Wang, J., Ross, W.S., Simmerling, C.L., Darden, T.A., Merz, K.M., Stanton, R.V., Cheung, A.I., Vincent, J.J., Crowley, M., Tsui, V., Gohike, H., Radmer, R.J., Duan, Y., Pitera, J., Massova, I., Seibel, G.L., Singh, U.C., Weiner, P.K., Kollman, P.A.: Amber 7.University of California, San Francisco ; 2002.         28.   Lazaridis T, Karplus M: Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction.Current opinion in structural biology 2000, 10(2):139-145.         29.   John B, Sali A: Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment.Nucleic acids research 2003, 31(14):3982-3992.         30.   Gront D, Kolinski A: HCPM--program for hierarchical clustering of protein models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2005, 21(14):3179-3180.         31.   Pettitt CS, McGuffin LJ, Jones DT: Improving sequence-based fold recognition by using 3D model quality assessment.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2005, 21(17):3509-3515.         32.   Gront D, Kolinski A: BioShell--a package of tools for structural biology computations.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2006, 22(5):621-622.         33.   Home page of the Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers[http://www.biocomp.chem.uw.edu.pl]