Login

Join for Free!
114145 members
table of contents table of contents

Biology Articles » Bioethics » The tension between self governance and absolute inner worth in Kant’s moral philosophy

Abstract
- The tension between self governance and absolute inner worth in Kant’s moral philosophy

MEDICAL ETHICS

The tension between self governance and absolute inner worth in Kant’s moral philosophy

M Häyry

Correspondence to:
M Häyry
Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, Institute of Medicine, Law and Bioethics, School of Law, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; matti.hayry@manchester.ac.uk

Original version received 11 July 2004

Revised version received 24 January 2005

Accepted for publication 19 February 2005


The concepts of autonomy as the self governance of individuals and dignity as the inner worth of human beings play an important role in contemporary bioethics. Since both notions are crucial to Immanuel Kant’s moral theory, it would be tempting to think that Kantian ethics could ease the friction between the two concepts. It is argued in this paper, however, that this line of thought cannot be supported by Kant’s original ideas. While he did make a conscious effort to bring autonomy and dignity together, his emphasis on the absolute inner worth of our collective humanity made it impossible for him to embrace fully the personal self determination of individuals, as it is usually understood in today’s liberal thinking.

Keywords: autonomy; dignity; ethics; Kant; Kantian

Source: Journal of Medical Ethics 2005;31:645-647.


rating: 1.00 from 3 votes | updated on: 18 Jan 2007 | views: 3304 |

Rate article:







excellent!bad…