Login

Join for Free!
17814 members
table of contents table of contents

The objective of this study was to examine the effects of flooding …


Biology Articles » Hydrobiology » Phosphorus Availability in an Artificially Flooded Southeastern Floodplain Forest Soil » Tables

Tables
- Phosphorus Availability in an Artificially Flooded Southeastern Floodplain Forest Soil

..................................................

Table 1. Physical and chemical characteristics of mesocosm soils collected in January 1992.{dagger}

Property
Value
Physical
 Soil texture, g kg-1
 Sand 622 ± 19
 Silt 196 ± 9
 Clay 188 ± 17
Chemical
 Mean pH 4.9
 Organic matter, g kg-1{ddagger} 91 ± 5
 Resin-extractable Pi, mg kg-1 9.5 ± 1.4
 Water-soluble Po, mg kg-1 7.2 ± 0.4
 0.5 M NaHCO3, mg kg-1
 Pi 2.61 ± 2.5
 Po 39.3 ± 3.6
 Microbial, mg kg-1
 P 109.6 ± 10.7
 Po 8.0 ± 1.5
 0.1 M NaOH I, mg kg-1
 Pi 52.0 ± 4.8
 Po 62.5 ± 5.8
 0.1 M NaOH II, mg kg-1
 Pi
7.2 ± 0.6
 Po 23.4 ± 2.4
 1.0 M HCl P, mg kg-1 3.9 ± 0.3
 Residual P, mg kg-1 51.4 ± 14.7
 Total P, mg kg-1§ 375.5 ± 29.0
 Total P, mg kg-1 349.7 ± 21.3
 Total N, mg kg-1
2540.1 ± 162.5

{dagger} Values are sample means (n = 20) ± standard errors based on the standard deviation of n = 20 sample values divided by the square root of n = 20.

{ddagger} Loss on ignition.

§ Includes: 0.5 M NaHCO3 Pi and Po, microbial P, 0.1 M NaOH I and II Pi, and Po, 1.0 M HCl P, and residual P.

Total P from digestion of nonextracted soils.

..................................................

Table 2. Comparison of total P supply to in situ AER in treatment soils during flooded periods and nonflooded control soils during those same periods.

in situ AER
Treatment{dagger}
Duration
of flooding
Flooding treatments{dagger}
Controls{ddagger}
mo _ µg _
FD§ 3 1972.9 ± 450.8* 160.2 ± 25.8
+P 3 947.6 ± 212.1* 160.2 ± 25.8
+N# 3 776.8 ± 159.2* 160.2 ± 25.8
PF{dagger}{dagger} 4 968.6 ± 223.7* 192.6 ± 27.6
CF{ddagger}{ddagger}
6
1223.1 ± 197.9*
299.3 ± 40.0

* Significant at the 0.05 level.

{dagger} Values based on means of the total P supply (n = 4 per treatment) for each flooding duration.

{ddagger} Values based on means of the total P supply (n = 4 per control) for each respective time period.

§ FD = flooded–drained treatment.

+P = flooded–drained treatment with P additions.

# N = flooded–drained treatment with N additions.

{dagger}{dagger} PF = periodically flooded treatment.

{ddagger}{ddagger} CF = continuously flooded treatment.


..................................................

Table 3. Comparison of microbial biomass P in treatment soils during flooded months and control soils during those same months.

Microbial P
Time
Flooding treatments{dagger}
Controls{ddagger}
mo _ mg kg-1 _
Jul§ 123.8 ± 7.1* 152.7 ± 15.7
Aug 84.0 ± 7.2* 137.8 ± 22.3
Sep# 57.9 ± 6.3* 107.5 ± 15.2
Oct{dagger}{dagger} 93.5 ± 14.3 126.1 ± 17.4
Nov{ddagger}{ddagger} 94.1 ± 14.0 113.6 ± 19.2
Dec§§
94.5 ± 17.0
133.0 ± 20.8

* Significant at the 0.05 level.

{dagger} Values based on means of treatments (n = 4 per treatment) flooded during the respective month.

{ddagger} Values based on means of controls (n = 4 per control) during the respective month.

§ Jul = CF (continuously flooded), PF (periodically flooded treatment), FD (flooded–drained), +P (flooded–drained treatment with P additions), +N (flooded–drained treatment with N additions).

Aug = CF, PF, FD, +P, +N.

# Sep = CF, FD, +P, +N.

{dagger}{dagger} Oct = CF, PF.

{ddagger}{ddagger} Nov = CF, PF.

§§ Dec = CF.

..................................................


rating: 0.00 from 0 votes | updated on: 14 May 2007 | views: 837 |

Rate article:







excellent!bad…