Login

Join for Free!
18528 members
table of contents table of contents

Most of the fossils remain unidentified, but are probably semi-aquatic swamp plants.


Biology Articles » Paleobiology » Paleobotany » Monocot macrofossils from the miocene of Southern New Zealand » Figures

Figures
- Monocot macrofossils from the miocene of Southern New Zealand

 

 mcith_fig01.jpg
Click to enlarge image
Figure 1. Locality maps. The upper map shows the position of Blue Lake (the location of sample numbers prefixed with “BL-“, Grey Lake (the location of sample numbers prefixed with “GL-“), and Bannockburn-1. The grey circle is a schematic indication of the extent of the Manuherikia Group. The lower map shows the position of all drill-cores in Southland (the location of sample numbers prefixed with “Sthd-“) from which fossils were obtained. For precise locations of all samples, see Pole (2007).
 mcith_fig02.jpg
Click to enlarge image

Figure 2. Extant New Zealand monocots. 1. Rhopalostylis sapida, TLM view of stomatal complexes, and (upper right) compound gland (OPH2638, scale bar = 50 µm); 2. Freycinetia banksii, TLM view of stomatal complexes (OPH7429, scale bar = 50 µm, CHR218519); 3. Cordyline australis, TLM view of stomatal complexes (OPH7433, scale bar = 50 µm, CHR509649); 4. Phormium cookianum, TLM view of stomatal complexes. Note complexes are sunken in narrow grooves (OPH7425, scale bar = 50 µm, CHR228076A); 5. Phormium tenax, TLM view of stomatal complexes. Note the highly networked nature of the complexes (OPH7427, scale bar = 50 µm, CHR261417); 6. Typha orientalis, TLM view of stomatal complexes (OPH7430, scale bar = 50 µm).

 mcith_fig03.jpg
Click to enlarge image

Figure 3. CUT-Mo-EEI, and extant Smilax and Rhipogonum. 1. CUT-Z-EEI, TLM view of stomatal complex (SL5435, scale bar = 50 µm); 2. CUT-Z-EEI, TLM detail of stomatal complex (SL5435, scale bar = 20 µm); 3. CUT-Z-EEI, outer SEM view of a single stoma. Note pinched appearance of outer stomatal ledge, and arching ridges of cuticle (S-1049, scale bar = 10 µm); 4. CUT-Z-EEI, inner SEM view of a single stoma (S-1709, scale bar = 10 µm); 5. CUT-Z-EEI, TLM view of single stomatal complex (SL2035, scale bar = 20 µm); 6. TLM of extant Rhipogonum scandens (OPH2631, scale bar = 20 µm); 7. TLM of extant Smilax australis (AQ037802, scale bar = 50 µm); 8. TLM of extant Rhipogonum album (AQ330750, scale bar = 50 µm).

 mcith_fig04.jpg
Click to enlarge image

Figure 4. CUT-Mo-EFG and CUT-Mo-EFE and Astelia papuana (Cuticle morphologies are described as parataxa. They are given a non-hierarchical parataxon code. For pragmatism this consists of the prefix 'CUT-Mo-' (for "cuticle-monocot") followed by a string of three letters. These letters have no meaning, but together with the prefix, form a unique text string). 1. CUT-Mo-EFG, TLM view of stomatal complexes. Note extremely thin cuticle (SL1969, scale bar = 50 µm); 2. CUT-Mo-EFG, TLM view of single stomatal complex at upper left (SL1969, scale bar = 20 µm); 3. CUT-Mo-EFE, TLM view of pairs of glandular trichomes which may mark the position of stomatal complexes (SL1683, scale bar = 50 µm); 4. CUT-Mo-EFE, TLM detail of a pair of glandular trichomes (SL1683, scale bar = 20 µm); 5. CUT-Mo-EFE, outer SEM view of pairs of glandular trichomes (S-1054, scale bar = 100 µm); 6. CUT-Mo-EFE, outer SEM view showing several pairs of glandular trichomes (S-1054, scale bar = 50 µm); 7. Extant Astelia papuana (AQ053799, scale bar = 50 µm); 8. Extant A. papuana (AQ053799, scale bar = 20 µm).

mcith_fig05.jpg 
Click to enlarge image

Figure 5. CUT-Mo-EFH and CUT-Mo-FEH. 1. CUT-Mo-EFH, TLM view of rows of papillae (SL1968, scale bar = 50 µm); 2. CUT-Mo-EFH, Outer SEM view of cuticle (S-1059, scale bar = 20 µm); 3. CUT-Mo-EFH, inner SEM view of cuticle (S-1059, scale bar = 50 µm); 4. CUT-Mo-EFH, inner SEM view of cuticle (S-1059, scale bar = 20 µm); 5. CUT-Mo-FEH, TLM view of two stomatal complexes. Note lack of any row structure and complex stomatal construction (SL3238, scale bar = 50 µm); 6. CUT-Mo-FEH, TLM detail of stomatal complex (SL3238, scale bar = 20 µm); 7. CUT-Mo-FEH, Inner SEM view of a single stomatal complex (S-1360, scale bar = 20 µm); 8. CUT-Mo-FEH, Outer SEM view of a single stomatal pore (arrowed) (S-1360, scale bar = 50 µm).

 mcith_fig06.jpg
Click to enlarge image
Figure 6. CUT-Mo-FJC and CUT-Mo-FFJ. 1. CUT-Mo-FJC, TLM view of stomatal complexes. Note relatively small and sharply defined papillae (SL2419, scale bar = 50 µm); 2. CUT-Mo-FJC, TLM detail of two stomatal complexes. Note distinctively narrow stoma and relatively small and sharply defined papillae (SL2419, scale bar = 20 µm); 3. CUT-Mo-FFJ, TLM view of stomatal complexes. Note papillae generally confined to subsidiary cells (SL3239, scale bar = 50 µm); 4. CUT-Mo-FFJ, TLM detail of stomatal complex (SL3239, scale bar = 20 µm); 5. CUT-Mo-FFJ, inner SEM detail of a single stomatal complex (S-1361, scale bar = 10 µm); 6. CUT-Mo-FFJ, outer SEM view of at least two stomatal complexes (S-1361, scale bar = 10 µm).
 mcith_fig07.jpg
Click to enlarge image

Figure 7. CUT-Mo-FJE, CUT-Mo-AAI, and CUT-Mo-EFI. 1. CUT-Mo-FJE, TLM view of stomatal complexes (SL2524, scale bar = 50 µm); 2. CUT-Mo-FJE, TLM detail of stomatal complex (SL2524, scale bar = 20 µm); 3. CUT-Mo-AAI, TLM view of stomatal complexes, SB1357, scale bar = 50 µm); 4. CUT-Mo-AAI, TLM detail of stomatal complex (SB1357, scale bar = 20 µm); 5. CUT-Mo-EFI, TLM view of two stomatal complexes (SL1973, scale bar = 50 µm); 6. CUT-Mo-EFI, TLM detail of stomatal complex. Note distinctive straight sides to complex and ridges of cuticle flanking the outer stomatal ledges (SL1973, scale bar = 20 µm); 7. CUT-Mo-EFI, inner SEM detail of a single stomatal complex (S-1060, scale bar = 20 µm); 8. CUT-Mo-EFI, outer SEM view of a single stoma. Note pinched appearance of outer stomatal ledge and slit-like aperture (S-1060, scale bar = 20 µm).

 mcith_fig08.jpg
Click to enlarge image
Figure 8. CUT-Mo-EIA, CUT-Mo-FEG, CUT-Mo-EHB, and CUT-Mo-EFF. 1. CUT-Mo-EIA, TLM view of stomatal complexes (SL2446, scale bar = 50 µm); 2. CUT-Mo-EIA, TLM detail of two stomatal complexes (SL2446, scale bar = 20 µm); 3. CUT-Mo-FEG, TLM view of stomatal complexes. Note subdued and fused papillae (SL2093, scale bar = 50 µm); 4. CUT-Mo-FEG, TLM detail of stomatal complex. Note subdued and fused papillae (SL2093, scale bar = 20 µm); 5. CUT-Mo-EHB, TLM view of stomatal complexes. Note absence of any clear row structure or regular costal-intercostal distinction. Some more elongate epidermal cells are visible near the lower edge of the figure (SL1541, scale bar = 50 µm); 6. CUT-Mo-EHB, TLM detail of stomatal complex. Note distinctive rounded outline of the stoma and the pinched ends of the stomatal aperture (SL1541, scale bar = 20 µm); 7. CUT-Mo-EFF, TLM view of stomatal complexes (SL1785, scale bar = 50 µm); 8. CUT-Mo-EFF, TLM detail of two stomatal complexes. Note four isodiametric lateral subsidiary cells on left complex (SL1785, scale bar = 20 µm).
mcith_fig09.jpg 
Click to enlarge image

Figure 9. Fossil and extant Typha. 1. CUT-Mo-FFA, TLM view of stomatal complexes (SL3141, scale bar = 50 µm); 2. CUT-Mo-FFA, TLM detail of stomatal complex. Note ridges of cuticle closely flanking the outer stomatal ridges (SL3141, scale bar = 20 µm); 3. extant Typha domingensis (AQ399599, scale bar = 50 µm); 4. extant T. domingensis (AQ399599, scale bar = 20 µm).

mcith_fig10.jpg 
Click to enlarge image

Figure 10. CUT-Mo-EII and CUT-Mo-FEF. 1. CUT-Mo-EII, TLM view of stomatal complexes (SL1873, scale bar = 50 µm); 2. CUT-Mo-EII, TLM detail of stomatal complex (SL1873, scale bar = 20 µm); 3. CUT-Mo-EII, inner SEM detail of two stomatal complexes. Ragged flanges are partial cutinisation of inner periclinal walls (S-1105, scale bar = 20 µm); 4. CUT-Mo-EII, outer SEM view of a single stomatal complex. Note how periclinal walls bulge outwards (S-1105, scale bar = 20 µm); 5. CUT-Mo-FEF, TLM view of stomatal complexes. Note dark ring of trichome at centre left (SL3143, scale bar = 50 µm); 6. CUT-Mo-FEF, TLM detail of stomatal complex (SL3143, scale bar = 20 µm).

mcith_fig11.jpg 
Click to enlarge image

Figure 11. Typha seeds, TLM views of seeds mounted in glycerine jelly; scale bar = 0.2 mm. 1. SL4408; 2. SL2519; 3. SL2430; 4. SL1957; 5. SL4407; 6. SL4405; 7. SL2196; 8. SL2430; 9. SL2429; 10. SL2431.

 


rating: 5.00 from 1 votes | updated on: 15 Mar 2008 | views: 382 |

Rate article:







excellent!bad…