table of contents 
This review quantifies N losses for various animal production strategies and to …
');
|
Biology Articles » Agriculture » Management to reduce nitrogen losses in animal production » Tables
Tables - Management to reduce nitrogen losses in animal production
Table 1. Typical values for the annual excretion of N by various animal types expressed as percentage of body weighta
| Animal type |
Annual N excretion, % BW |
|
| Swine |
| Nursery |
22 |
| Growing |
15 |
| Finish |
15 |
| Sows and litter |
17 |
| Gestating sows |
7 |
| Gilts |
9 |
| Boars |
6 |
| Poultry |
| Layer |
30 |
| Pullet |
23 |
| Broiler |
40 |
| Beef |
| Stocker |
11 |
| Feeder |
11 |
| Cow |
12 |
| Dairy |
| Cow (20 kg/d)b |
18 |
| Cow (33 kg/d) |
22 |
| Cow (45 kg/d) |
27 |
| Dry cow |
11 |
| Heifer/calves |
11 |
|
|
| aSource: Koelsch and Shapiro (1998). |
| bAverage daily milk production. |
|
Table 2. Typical N losses from animal housing facilities expressed as a percentage of total N excreteda
| Manure type |
Typical loss, % total N |
Range, % total N |
N form lostb |
|
| Poultry, high rise |
50 |
40 to 70 |
NH3 |
| Poultry, deep litter |
40 |
20 to 70 |
NH3, N2O, N2 |
| Poultry, cage and belt |
10 |
4 to 25 |
NH3 |
| Poultry, aviary |
30 |
15 to 35 |
NH3, N2O |
| Swine, slatted floor |
25 |
15 to 30 |
NH3 |
| Swine, deep litter |
50 |
50 to 60 |
NH3, N2O, N2 |
| Swine, free range |
35 |
25 to 40 |
NH3, NO3, N2, N2O |
| Cattle, tie stall |
8 |
2 to 35 |
NH3, N2O, N2 |
| Cattle, free stall |
16 |
10 to 20 |
NH3 |
| Cattle, bedded pack |
35 |
25 to 40 |
NH3, N2O, N2 |
| Cattle, feedlot |
50 |
40 to 90 |
NH3, NO3, N2O, N2 |
|
|
| aSummarized from Eghball and Power (1994); Groenestein and van Faassen (1996); Monteny and Erisman (1998); van Horne et al. (1998); Bierman et al. (1999); Oenema et al. (2000); Yang et al. (2000); Oenema et al. (2001b). |
| bN forms are listed in order of the expected quantity lost, with most of the loss being in the form of NH3. |
|
Table 3. Typical N losses for the major types of long-term manure storage used in animal production expressed as a percentage of total N entering storagea
| Manure type |
DM content, % |
Typical loss, % total N |
Range, % total N |
N form lostb |
|
| Solid heap, cattle and swine |
20 |
20 |
10 to 40 |
NH3, NO3, N2O |
| Solid heap, poultry |
50 |
10 |
5 to 15 |
NH3, NO3, N2O |
| Solid compost |
40 |
40 |
20 to 50 |
NH3, NO3, N2O |
| Slurry tank, top loaded |
10 |
30 |
20 to 35 |
NH3 |
| Slurry tank, bottom loaded |
10 |
8 |
5 to 10 |
NH3 |
| Slurry tank, enclosed |
10 |
4 |
2 to 8 |
NH3 |
| Anaerobic lagoon |
5 |
70 |
50 to 99 |
NH3, N2, N2O |
|
|
| aSummarized from Muck and Steenhuis (1982); Muck et al. (1984); Martins and Dewes (1992); Sommer et al. (1993); Sutton et al. (1994); Eghball et al. (1997); Sommer (1997); Petersen et al. (1998); van Horne et al. (1998); Sommer and Dahl (1999); Harper et al. (2000); Moller et al. (2000); Sommer (2001); Rodhe and Karlsson (2002). |
| bN forms are listed in order of the expected quantity lost, with most of the loss being in the form of NH3. |
|
Table 4. Typical N losses for major manure application methods expressed as a percentage of the initial total N applieda
| |
Ammonia loss
|
Other N lossb
|
| Manure type |
Average |
Range |
N |
N2O |
|
| |
——— ;% total N ——— |
| Irrigated slurry |
30 |
25 to 50 |
2 to 25 |
<1 to 4 |
| Broadcast slurry on grassland |
25 |
15 to 40 |
1 to 25 |
<1 to 4 |
| Broadcast slurry on bare soil |
20 |
10 to 27 |
1 to 25 |
<1 to 4 |
| Broadcast of solid cattle or swine |
20 |
8 to 60 |
1 to 25 |
<1 to 4 |
| Broadcast of solid poultry |
12 |
8 to 25 |
1 to 25 |
<1 to 4 |
| Band or trailing hose of slurry |
18 |
13 to 26 |
1 to 25 |
<1 to 4 |
| Incorporated within 6 hours |
10 |
6 to 13 |
1 to 25 |
<1 to 4 |
| Shallow injection of slurry |
8 |
7 to 12 |
2 to 25 |
<1 to 4 |
| Deep injection of slurry |
2 |
1 to 5 |
5 to 25 |
2 to 9 |
| Grazing feces and urine |
10 |
4 to 20 |
10 to 30 |
<1 to 8 |
|
|
| aSummarized from Ball and Ryden (1984); Garwood and Ryden (1986); Ryden (1986); Jarvis et al. (1989); Sommer et al. (1991); Gangbazo et al. (1995); Sommer and Hutchings (1995); Clough et al. (1996); de Klein et al. (1996); Dosch and Gutser (1996); Rubæk et al. (1996); Cary et al. (1997); Stout et al. (1997); Beckwith et al. (1998); Leinonen et al. (1998); van Horne et al. (1998); Weslien et al. (1998); Silva et al. (1999); Meisinger and Jokelo (2000); Stout et al. (2000); Oenema et al. (2001b); Rochette et al. (2001); Di and Cameron (2002a,b,c); Rodhe and Karlsson (2002); Sherlock et al. (2002); Mattila and Joki-Tokola (2003). |
| bSubstantial loss of N2 can also occur through denitrification, which is not documented due to its neutral effect on the environment. |
| cNitrate leaching loss should be small (<5% of total N) when manure is applied to cropland in the spring, but much greater loss can be expected when manure is applied to fallow land in autumn. |
|
rating: 6.88 from 8 votes | updated on: 20 Jul 2008 | views: 18309 |
|