Login

Join for Free!
17813 members
table of contents table of contents

This report assesses the variation across fractionated sera processed over a one-month …


Biology Articles » Methods & Techniques » Laboratory methods to improve SELDI peak detection and quantitation » Tables

Tables
- Laboratory methods to improve SELDI peak detection and quantitation

Table 1
Fractions and ProteinChips considered having sufficient complexity for the analysis.
ProteinChip
Fractions used in analysis
IMAC
F1
F3
F4

F6
H50
F1
F3
F4

F6
CM10-LS
F1
F3
F4
F5
F6
CM10-HS

F3
F4


Bold – denotes fractions to be highly variable across batches.
Table 2
Summary table of results comparing Exp.1 and Exp.2 showing improvement in peak detection and peak intensity variation following optimization of protocols.


Experiment 1
Experiment 2


Protein Chip
Fraction
No. Spectra excluded (Total 18)
No. Peaks
Averaged CV Peak Intensity (%)
CV Range
No. Peaks (%) statistically different across batches (p a
No. Spectra excluded (Total 18)
No. Peaks
Averaged CV Peak Intensity (%)
CV Range
No. Peaks statistically (%) different across batches (p a

F1
5
16
31.7
12–127
0
1
28
20.9
8–36
2 (7)

F3
1
11
31.2
15–75
0
0
21
31.4
12–52
2 (10)
IMAC
F4
3
7
44.7
29–61
1 (14)
0
20
26.0
14–45
2 (10)

F6
3
21
27.0
15–39
0
7
27
22.6
11–49
9 (33)

LS-F1
4
22
31.0
15–50
0
1
23
18.1
11–41
1 (4)

LS-F3
6
5
41.5
25–48
0
0
23
26.4
13–40
3 (13)

LS-F4
1
13
37.4
18–55
6 (46)
1
26
14.7
8–30
0
CM10
LS-F5
4
9
30.6
20–46
3 (33)
0
27
16.4
8–30
1 (4)

LS-F6
3
13
29.4
18–44
0
2
30
25.4
8–50
11 (37)

HS-F3
6
3
66.5
53–85
0b
1
15
49.2
27–148
9 (60)

HS-F4
6
5
48.7
19–72
0
3
14
30.6
10–46
0

F1
5
6
67.5
40–129
0
0
16
32.7
15–66
2 (13)

F3
0
13
32.4
16–50
3 (23)
1
17
22.8
15–38
5 (29)
H50
F4
2
15
33.0
15–79
2 (15)
1
21
22.5
11–53
5 (24)

F6
2
30
23.7
13–39
1 (3)
1
35
25.0
12–55
3 (9)
a This column reports the number of peaks in the ProteinChip-fraction spectra that were considered to have different peak intensities between batches as calculated by the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis (p b Analysis performed on 2 batches, not 3.
Table 3
Differences in sample processing and analysis setting between Exp.1 and Exp.2

EAM application
Acquisition protocol optimization
Specimen applied for optimization
Spot correction
Exp.1
Manual
Chip specific
Whole serum
No
Exp.2
Automated
Chip and Fraction specific
Appropriate serum fraction QC
Yes

rating: 0.00 from 0 votes | updated on: 23 Aug 2007 | views: 993 |

Rate article:







excellent!bad…