Table 1. Summary of support measures (parsimony bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probabilities) for different bee lineages
|
| Clade |
Parsimony DNA data |
Parsimony + morphology |
K2P + I + G post. prob. |
HKY + I + G post. prob. |
GTR + G post. prob. |
GTR + I + G post. prob. |
GTR + SYM post. prob. |
|
| Apiformes (bees) |
96 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Dasypodaidae |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Melittidae (s.s.) |
88 |
77 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Melittidae + Meganomiidae |
98 |
99 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Melittidae/Meganomiidae + all others |
90 |
86 |
52 |
61 |
83 |
81 |
78 |
| LT bees |
84 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Megachilidae |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Apidae |
92 |
94 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| LT bees + Andrenidae + Halictidae + Stenotritidae + Colletidae |
86 |
78 |
98 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
98 |
| Andrenidae |
99 |
99 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Andreninae |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Panurginae |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Panurginae + Oxaeinae |
NA |
NA |
100 |
100 |
100 |
98 |
100 |
| Andrenidae + Halictidae +Stenotritidae + Colletidae |
64 |
87 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Halictidae |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Halictinae |
72 |
79 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Rophitinae |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Halictidae + Stenotritidae + Colletidae |
90 |
91 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Stenotritidae + Colletidae |
99 |
98 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Colletidae |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Arithmetic mean – ln (burnin = 2000) |
|
|
–74,130.22 |
–74,011.09 |
–74,569.35 |
–73,940.96 |
–73,936.85 |
| Harmonic mean – ln (burnin = 2000) |
|
|
–74,192.73 |
–74,076.42 |
–74,637.03 |
–74,006.94 |
–74,005.60 |
|
Posterior probabilities (post. prob.) calculated based on the last 8,000 trees from each analysis. K2P, Kimura two-parameter; HKY, Hasegawa–Kishino–Yano; NA, not applicable.