Login

Join for Free!
17813 members
table of contents table of contents

Biology Articles » Hydrobiology » Marine Biology » Gloom and doom? The future of marine capture fisheries » Tables

Tables
- Gloom and doom? The future of marine capture fisheries

Table 1

Correspondence between development stages and their relation with MSY.

method categories
stock assessments underexploited moderately exploited fully exploited overfished and depleted recovering
landing trends undeveloped developing mature senescent recovering
relation to maximum production well below it approaching it at or close to it below it coming back to it
Table 2

Situation by 2020 (Delgado et al. 2003).

(Apparent errors are caused by rounding of values. Fishmeal equivalent round weight: using a conversion factor of 5.)

price difference (%)
scenarios food fish supply (106 t) capture (106 t) aquaculture (106 t) fish meal (106 t) (round weight) consumption (kg per capita) high-value species low-value species fishmeal
present situation (1997) 93 64 29 15.7
baseline scenario 130 76 54 39.5 17.1 15 6 18
50% faster aquaculture development rate 144 74 69 19.0 9 −12 42
if Chinese production was overestimated 123 69 53 16.1 16 6 21
with more efficient use of feeds in aquaculture 131 77 54 17.2 14 5 −16
50% slower aquaculture development rate 119 76 41 15.7 19 25 0
gradual resource depletion 108 53 55 14.2 69 35 134
Table 3

Trends in SOFIA 2002 for 2010–2030 and comparison with Fish 2020 predictions.

(All figures, in mt, have been rounded.)

2000 2010 2020 2030
a w/o China w/o China w/o China Fish 2020c w/o China
marine capture 87 72 84 70 84 70 84 70
inland capture 9 7 9 7 9 7 94 7
total capture 95 79 99 83 103 87 120d 107 91
aquaculture 36 11 53 16 70 22 41 (54)69 87 27
total production 131 90 152 99 173 109 (B)e 194 118
food fish productionb 96 123 147 108 (130)144 165
percentage used for food 74% 81% 85% (77%)f 85%
on food use 35 29 26 (40%)g 30
a Based on latest FAO statistics.
b Aquatic animals other than reptiles or mammals, excluding quantities reduced in fishmeal and oil.
c Fish 2020: most likely scenario (bold, in brackets) together with best and worst cases if available.
d Calculated by the authors from total production minus aquaculture.
e Calculated by the authors adding food fish to fishmeal production.
f Calculated by the authors comparing food and non-food use.
g Calculated by the authors multiplying fishmeal production forecasts by a factor of 5.
Table 4

Correspondence between the various future world scenarios.

business as usual worst case best case
Hammond (1998) market world fortress world transformed world
Gallopin (2002) conventional worlds barbarization great transitions
reference world policyreform fortress world breakdown world eco-communalism new sustainability
UNEP (2002) market first policy first security first sustainability first

 


rating: 0.00 from 0 votes | updated on: 5 Aug 2007 | views: 600 |

Rate article:







excellent!bad…