The overall aim of this study was to test directly for genetic …

• Abstract
• Background
• Results
• Discussion
• Conclusion
• Methods
• References
• Figure
• Tables

1. Roff DA: The Evolution of Life Histories.New York: Chapman and Hall; 2002.

2. Stearns SC: The Evolution of Life Histories.New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.

3. Andersson M: Sexual selection.Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1994.

4. Johnstone RA: Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle: reviewing the evidence.

   Biol Rev 1995, 70:1-65.

5. Cotton S, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A: Do sexual oranaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis?

   Proc Yoy Soc Lond B 2004, 271:771-783.

6. Andersson M: Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences.

   Evolution 1986, 4:804-816.

7. Sheldon BC, Verhulst S: Ecological immunology: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology.

   Trends Ecology & Evolution 1996, 11:317-321.

8. Rowe L, Houle D: The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits.

   Proc R Soc Lond B 1996, 263:1415-1421.

9. Hamilton WD, Zuk M: Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites.

   Science 1982, 218:384-387.

10. Loye JE, Zuk M: Bird-parasite interaction: ecology, evolution and behaviour.Oxford University Press; 1991.

11. Folstad I, Karter AJ: Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap.

    Am Nat 1992, 139:603-622.

12. Gustafsson L, Nordling D, Andersson MS, Sheldon BC, Qvarnstrom A: Infectious diseases, reproductive effort and the cost of reproduction in birds.

    Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 1994, 346:323-331.

13. Moller AP: Hormones, handicaps and bright birds.

    Trends Ecology & Evolution 1995, 10:121.

14. Westneat DF, Birkhead TR: Alternative hypotheses linking the immune system and mate choice for good genes.

    Proc R Soc Lond B 1998, 265:1065-1073.

15. Lochmiller RL, Vestey MR, Boren JC: Relationship between protein nutritional status and immunocompetence in northern bobwhite chicks.

    The Auk 1993, 110:503-510.

16. Deerenberg C, Apanius V, Daan S, Bos N: Reproductive effort decreases antibody responsiveness.

    Proc R Soc Lond B 1997, 264:1021-1029.

17. Lochmiller RL, Deerenberg C: Trade-offs in evolutionary immunology: just what is the cost of immunity?

    Oikos 2000, 88:87-98.

18. Norris K, Evans MR: Ecological immunology: life history trade-offs and immune defense in birds.

    Behav Ecol 2000, 11:19-26.

19. Zuk M, Stoehr AM: Immune defense and host life history.

    Am Nat 2002, 160:S9-S22.

20. Gonzalez G, Sorci G, Moller AP, Ninni P, Haussy C, De LF: Immunocompetence and condition-dependent sexual advertisement in male house sparrows (Passer domesticus).

    J Anim Ecol 1999, 68:1225-1234.

21. Alonso-Alvarez C, Tella JL: Effects of experimental food restriction and body-mass changes on avian T-cell-mediated immune response.

    Can J Zool 2001, 79:101-105.

22. Moller AP, Petrie M: Condition dependence, multiple sexual signals, and immunocompetence in peacocks.

    Behav Ecol 2002, 13:248-253.

23. Merila J: Genetic variation in offspring condition – an experiment.

    Funct Ecol 1996, 10:465-474.

24. Gosler AG, Harper DGC: Assessing the heritability of body condition in birds: a challenge exemplified by the great tit Parus major L. (Aves).

    Biol J Linn Soc 2000, 71:103-117.

25. Saino N, Calza S, Moller AP: Immunocompetence of nestling barn swallows in relation to brood size and parental effort.

    J Anim Ecol 1997, 66:827.

26. Wakelin D, Apianus V: Immune defences: genetic control.In Host-parasite evolution. General principles and avian models. Edited by: Clayton DH, Moore J. Oxford University Press; 1997:30-58.

27. Brinkhof MWG, Heeb P, Kolliker M, Richner H: Immunocompetence of nestling great tits in relation to rearing environment and parentage.

    Proc R Soc Lond B 1999, 266:2315-2322.

28. Kurtz J, Sauer KP: The immunocompetence handicap hypothesis: testing the genetic predictions.

    Proc R Soc Lond B 1999, 266:2515-2522.

29. Roulin A, Jungi TW, Pfister H, Dijkstra C: Female barn owls (Tyto alba) advertise good genes.

    Proc R Soc Lond B 2000, 267:937-941.

30. Christe P, Moller AP, de Lope F: Immunocompetence and nestling survival in the house martin: the tasty chick hypothesis.

    Oikos 1998, 83:175-179.

31. Tella JL, Bortolotti GR, Forero MG, Dawson RD: Environmental and genetic variation in T-cell-mediated immune response of fledgling American kestrels.

    Oecologia 2000, 123:453-459.

32. Soler JJ, Moreno J, Potti J: Environmental, genetic and maternal components of immunocompetence of nestling pied flycatchers from a cross-fostering study.

    Evolutionary Ecology Research 2003, 5:259-272.

33. Ryder JJ, Siva-Jothy MT: Quantitative genetics of immune function and body size in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus.

    J Evol Biol 2001, 14:646-653.

34. Verhulst S, Dieleman SJ, Parmentier HK: A tradeoff between immunocompetence and sexual ornamentation in domestic fowl.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96:4478-4481.

35. Kraaijeveld AR, Godfray HCJ: Trade-off between parasitoid resistance and larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster.

    Nature 1997, 389:278-280.

36. Kotiaho JS, Simmons LW, Tomkins JL: Towards a resolution of the lek paradox.

    Nature 2001, 410:684-686.

37. Burley N, Coopersmith CB: Bill colour preferences for zebra finches.

    Ethology 1987, 76:133-151.

38. Collins SA, ten Cate C: Does beak colour affect female preference in zebra finches?

    Anim Behav 1996, 52:105-112.

39. Birkhead TR, Fletcher F, Pellatt EJ: Sexual selection in the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata : condition, sex traits and immune capacity.

    Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1998, 44:179-191.

40. Blount JD, Metcalfe NB, Birkhead TR, Surai PF: Carotenoid modulation of immune function and sexual attractiveness in zebra finches.

    Science 2003, 300:125-127.

41. Ewenson E, Zann R, Flannery G: PHA immune response assay in captive zebra finches is modulated by activity prior to testing.

    Anim Behav 2003, 66:797-800.

42. Riska B, Rutledge JJ, Atchley WR: Genetic analysis of crossfostering data with sire and dam records.

    The Journal of Heredity 1985, 76:247-250.

43. Lande R: The dynamics of peak shifts and the pattern of morphological evolution.

    Paleobiol 1986, 12:343-354.

44. Pease CM, Bull JJ: A critique of methods for measuring life history trade-offs.

    J Evol Biol 1988, 1:293-303.

45. Green AJ: Mass/length residuals: measures of body condition or generators of spurious results?

    Ecology 2001, 82:1473-1483.

46. Brown ME: Assessing body condition in birds.

    Current Ornithol 1996, 13:67-135.

47. Owens IPF, Wilson K: Immunocompetence: a neglected life history trait or conspicuous red herring?

    Trends Ecol Evol 1999, 14:170-172.

48. Hoi-Leitner M, Romero-Pujante M, Hoi H, Pavlova A: Food availability and immune capacity in serin (Serinus serinus) nestlings.

    Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2001, 49:333-339.

49. Lynch M, Walsh B: Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits.Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer; 1998.

50. Atchley WR, Rutledge JJ: Genetic components of size and shape. I. Dynamics of components of phenotypic variability and covariability during ontogeny in the laboratory rat.

    Evolution 1980, 34:1161-1173.

51. Price T: Environmental and genotype-by-environment influences on chick size in the Yellow-browed leaf warbler Phylloscopus inornatus.

    Oecologia 1991, 86:535-541.

52. Birkhead TR, Burke T, Zann R, Hunter FM, Krupa AP: Extra-pair paternity and intraspecific brood parasitism in wild Zebra Finches Taeniopygia guttata, revealed by DNA fingerprinting.

    Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1990, 27:315-324.

53. Merila J, Sheldon BC: Avian Quantitative Genetics.

    Current Ornithol 2001, 16:179-255.

54. Rutledge JJ, Robinson OW, Eisen EJ, Legets JE: Dynamics of genetic and maternal effects in mice.

    J Anim Sci 1972, 35:911-918.

55. Riska B, Rutledge JJ, Atchley WR: Covariance between direct and maternal genetic effects in mice, with a model of persistent environmental-influences.

    Genet Res 1985, 45:287-297.

56. Newman S, Rutledge JJ, Riska B: Estimation of prenatal maternal genetic-effects.

    J Anim Breed Gen 1989, 106:30-38.

57. McAdam AG, Boutin S: Effects of food abundance on genetic and maternal variation in the growth rate of juvenile red squirrels.

    J Evol Biol 2003, 16:1249-1256.

58. Falconer DS: Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.USA Longman Scientific & Technical; 1989.