A systems analysis of the physiological and geochemical processes involved was presented, …

• Abstract
• A Systems Analysis of Plants and CO2
• Paleozoic Carbon Cycle Feedbacks
• End-Triassic Carbon Cycle Feedbacks
• Conclusions
• References
• Figures

Biology Articles » Evolutionary Biology » Feedbacks and the coevolution of plants and atmospheric CO2 » A Systems Analysis of Plants and CO2

A Systems Analysis of Plants and CO2

- Feedbacks and the coevolution of plants and atmospheric CO2

Abiotic regulation of Earth's global climate on a multimillion-year time scale is achieved by the long-term inorganic carbon cycle, whereby the concentration of the greenhouse gas CO₂ is controlled by its supply from volcanoes and metamorphic degassing, and removal by the chemical weathering of calcium and magnesium silicate rocks (1, 2). The advent of vascular land plants introduced a potent biotic feedback into climate regulation, with the capacity to alter the long-term atmospheric CO₂ concentration through the production of organic matter for burial in sediments, and acceleration of the chemical weathering of silicate rocks (3). However, long-term changes in CO₂ and climate also play an important role in driving terrestrial plant development and evolution (4–7). Plant evolution therefore not only generates global changes in environmental conditions but also feeds back on itself. This codependency creates a tightly coupled regulatory system for the long-term carbon cycle, with numerous feedback mechanisms checking runaway changes in CO₂ and catastrophic planetary warming (8). Insight into these critical feedbacks is, however, extremely limited; over the last two decades, only two loops involving plants and CO₂ have been postulated (9, 10).

A Systems Analysis of Plants and CO₂ 

We characterize the network of geochemical effects of plants on atmospheric CO₂ and the physiological effects of CO₂ on plants using a systems analysis to reveal positive and negative geophysiological feedbacks involved with regulating the long-term carbon cycle (Fig. 1). Processes affecting CO₂ on long (million year) time scales, such as evolution and weathering, are incorporated along with those occurring on much shorter time scales (see legend of Fig. 1). We include the role played by terrestrial ecosystems in regulating the land–atmosphere exchange of water vapor and recycling of precipitation, because both influence the hydrological cycle and weathering rates by altering the water–mineral contact time (11). Plain arrows indicate direct responses, and arrows with bull's-eyes indicate inverse responses. For example, an increase in CO₂ leads to an increase in global mean surface temperature due to the atmospheric greenhouse effect (plain arrow i). Conversely, an increase in rock weathering leads to CO₂ consumption and a decrease in atmospheric CO₂ (bull's-eyed arrow g). Closed pathways linked together by an even number of arrows with bull's-eyes, or by no arrows with bull's-eyes, represent positive feedback loops (PFLs), and those with an odd number of arrows with bull's-eyes represent negative feedback loops (NFLs).

Our systems analysis identifies five important previously unrecognized PFLs involving land plants and CO₂. Those described by pathway a-b-c-d-e-f-g and its counterpart, i-k-c-d-e-f-g, involve the action of CO₂ on plant evolution and the feedback of plants on chemical weathering rates (Fig. 1). Three other PFLs emerge from the effects of terrestrial ecosystem evolution on sedimentary organic carbon burial (a-b-c-d-m-n and i-k-c-d-m-n) and the intensity of the hydrological cycle (a-b-c-d-u-q-r-g) (Fig. 1). All five pathways lead to positive feedbacks, whether CO₂ is rising or falling, but only if the paths at some stage involve very warm global climate states that could induce lethal overheating of leaves.

Positive feedback is initiated by a change in the global concentration of atmospheric CO₂, which inversely influences the density of stomatal pores on the leaves of vascular land plants (5). Falling CO₂ is accompanied by higher stomatal density, which, in turn, results in a lowering of leaf temperatures by increasing latent heat losses due to higher evapotranspiration rates (path a-b). Falling CO₂ also lowers ambient temperatures, because of the atmospheric greenhouse effect, and humidity, because of the exponential effect of temperature on the saturation content of water in air (12). These environmental effects reduce the leaf-to-air water vapor deficit, allowing stomatal conductance to water vapor to increase (12) and further reductions in leaf temperature (path i-p-s).

Because of the capacity for more efficient cooling, new trees develop with larger leaves that intercept more solar radiation (path c) without the attendant risks of lethal overheating (5, 7). Larger leaves promote increases in maximum canopy size; they represent an optimal tradeoff between investment in woody supporting tissue and leaf area for photosynthetic carbon gain (13). Furthermore, higher stomatal densities reduce the diffusional limitation on photosynthesis allowing increased rates of carboxylation in the primary photosynthetic enzyme of C₃ plants, ribulose-1,5-carboxylase/oxygenase (14). Increased photosynthetic capacity, coupled with greater interception of solar radiation by large leaves, facilitates the evolution of leafier, more productive plants (path d). Higher stomatal densities also permit taller plants by providing improved fine-scale control of transpiration to protect the increasing length of the xylem water pathway from cavitation (15) and distribute water and nutrients in the transpiration stream (14).

Larger plants require more nutrients and water than their smaller counterparts to support a higher biomass and transpirational stream (16). Meeting these increased demands requires more root (plus mycorrhizal) biomass and/or deeper rooting systems, as seen, for example, in contemporary vegetation where maximum rooting depth increases with progressively taller, leafier life-forms (trees > shrubs > herbs) (17). An expanding root system, in turn, increases weathering (3, 16, 18) (path f), described by the overall reaction

Eq. 1 summarizes the overall result of a wide variety of processes (3) including photosynthesis; secretion of soil organic acids and chelates by rootlets and associated symbionts; generation of CO₂ by respiration of soil organic matter; reaction of organic and carbonic acids with Ca and Mg silicate minerals (here simplified in composition); the transport of dissolved Ca, Mg, and bicarbonate ions by rivers to the ocean; and the precipitation of Ca and Mg carbonates onto the seafloor. The net effect is the transfer of atmospheric CO₂ to carbonate minerals that become buried in marine sediments, as succinctly represented by path g (Fig. 1), thereby completing the first proposed PFL (a-b-c-d-e-f-g). The second and complementary PFL to this one is given by i-k-c-d-e-f-g, where CO₂ acts directly on leaf temperatures via the atmospheric greenhouse effect.

Two other newly recognized PFLs, a-b-c-d-m-n and i-k-c-d-m-n, stem from enhanced deposition of organic matter in sediments due to higher ecosystem productivity and biomass. These PFLs apply both to terrestrial swamplands and to the marine environment after transport of the organic matter to the sea by rivers and is especially true of woody plants because of the relative nonbiodegradability of lignin. Increased burial of organic carbon results in overall net loss of CO₂ from the atmosphere (path n). Thus, both PFLs lead to a positive feedback on atmospheric CO₂. The fifth PFL (pathway a-b-c-d-u-q-r-g) occurs as actively transpiring leafier ecosystems introduce more water into the atmosphere in their surroundings, and recycle it more efficiently, thereby increasing local rainfall, rock weathering rates, and the further removal of CO₂ from the atmosphere (11).

Beside the four already established CO₂-stabilizing pathways (i-j-g, h-e-f-g, h-m-n, and i-p-q-r-g) (Fig. 1), our analysis also identifies an NFL operating as CO₂-related climate change alters the moisture content of the atmosphere and global rainfall patterns. With falling CO₂, decreased moisture and rainfall leads to decreased CO₂ removal via sedimentary organic carbon burial by strengthening water limitations on plant growth and decreasing the potential for wetland formation (i-p-q-t-n). The NFL i-j-g represents the well known greenhouse-weathering feedback that helps to stabilize atmospheric CO₂ against changes in volcanic and metamorphic degassing or solar heating over geological time (1, 2). This feedback can operate even in the absence of life (1). NFLs h-e-f-g and h-m-n represent additional negative feedback due to the fertilization (or starvation) of plant growth by CO₂ and the resulting acceleration (or deceleration) of plant-assisted weathering and organic burial in sediments, respectively (3, 9, 18, 19). The NFL i-p-q-r-g describes the negative feedback of CO₂ on weathering via its effects on the hydrological cycle and weathering (11).