Login

Join for Free!
118253 members
table of contents table of contents

Biodiversity offsets are conservation projects used mainly by business to counterbalance the …


Biology Articles » Conservation Biology » A database of schemes that prioritize sites and species based on their conservation value: focusing business on biodiversity » References

References
- A database of schemes that prioritize sites and species based on their conservation value: focusing business on biodiversity

  1. Myers NW, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J: Biodiversity hotspotsfor conservation priorities.

    Nature 2000, 403:853-858.

  2. Wilson E: The Future of Life. New York: Knopf; 2002.

  3. ten Kate K, Bishop J, Bayon R: Biodiversity offsets: Views, experience, and the business case. [http://www.insightinvestment.co.uk/Documents/responsibility/Reports/Biodiversity_Offsets_Report.pdf] IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK and Insight Investment, London, UK; OpenURL

  4. McKenny B: Environmental Offset Policies, Principles, and Methods: A Review of Selected Legislative Frameworks. [http://biodiversityneutral.org/EnvironmentalOffsetLegislativeFrameworks.pdf]

    Biodiversity Neutral Initiative

  5. The Energy and Biodiversity Initiative: Opportunities for benefiting biodiversity conservation [http://www.theebi.org/pdfs/opportunities.pdf]

  6. Future Forests: The Carbon Neutral Company [http://www.futureforests.com/]

  7. ICMM (International Council on Mining and Metals) [http://www.icmm.com/news/720biodiversity_proposition_2005.pdf]

  8. O'Rourke D: Market Movements: Nongovernmental organizations strategies to influence global production and consumption.

    Journal of Industrial Ecology 2005, 9:115-128.

  9. Redford KH, Coppolillo P, Sanderson EW, Da Fonseca GAB, Dinerstein E, Groves C, Mace G, Maginnis S, Mittermeier RA, Noss R, Olson D, Robinson JG, Vedder A, Wright M: Mapping the conservation landscape.

    Conservation Biology 2003, 17:116-131.

  10. Gordon EA, Franco OE, Tyrrell ML: Protecting Biodiversity: A Guide to Criteria Used by Global Conservation Organizations. [http://research.yale.edu/gisf/publications/conservation_report.pdf] Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies

  11. Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GAB, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Mittermeier CG, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL: Global Biodiversity Conservation Priorities.

    Science 2006, 313:58-61.

  12. The Nature Conservancy, World Wildlife Fund, Wildlife Conservation Society, Conservation International, and BirdLife International: A Resource Guide to Terrestrial Conservation Planning at the Regional Scale [http://www.botanicalsociety.org.za/cu/downloads/reports/Planning%20for%20Living%20Landscapes%202003.pdf]

  13. Margules CR, Usher MB: Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review.

    Biological Conservation 1981, 24:115-28.

  14. Margules CR, Nicholls AO, Pressey RL: Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity.

    Biological Conservation 1998, 43:63-76.

  15. Nicholls AO, Margules CR: An upgraded reserve selection algorithm.

    Biological Conservation 1993, 64:165-169.

  16. Pressey RL, Humphries CJ, Margules CR, Vane-Wright RI, Williams PH: Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection.

    Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1993, 8:124-128.

  17. Pressey RL, Ferrier S, Hutchinson CD, Sivertsen DP, Manion G: Planning for negotiation: using an interactive geographic information system to explore alternative protected area networks. In Nature Conservation: The Role of Networks. Edited by: Saunders, DA, Craig JL, Mattiske EM. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Sydney; 1995:23-33.

  18. Pressey RL: Algorithms, politics and timber: an example of the role of science in a public, political negotiation process over new conservation areas in production forests. In Ecology for Everyone: Communicating Ecology to Scientists, the Public and the Politicians. Edited by: Wills, R, Hobbs R. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Sydney; 1998:73-87.

  19. Wilson KA, Pressey RL, Newton AN, Burgman MA, Possingham HP, Weston CJ: Measuring and incorporating vulnerability into conservation planning.

    Environmental Management 2005, 35:527-543.

  20. Costello C, Polasky S: Dynamic reserve site selection.

    Resource and Energy Economics 2004, 26:157-174.

  21. Pressey RL, Johnson IR, Wilson PD: Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal.

    Biodiversity and Conservation 1994, 3:242-262.

  22. Ferrier S, Pressey RL, Barrett TW: A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement.

    Biological Conservation 2000, 93:303-325.

  23. Maddock A, Samways M: Planning for biodiversity conservation based on the knowledge of biologists.

    Biodiversity Conservation 2000, 9:1153-1169.

  24. Maddock A, Benn GA: Identification of conservation-worthy areas in Northern Zululand, South Africa.

    Conservation Biology 2000, 14:155-166.

  25. Cowling RM, Pressey RL: Introduction to systematic conservation planning in the Cape Floristic Region.

    Biological Conservation 2003, 112:1-13.

  26. Cowling RM, Pressey RL, Rouget M, Lombard AT: A conservation plan for a global biodiversity hotspot – the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa.

    Biological Conservation 2003, 112:191-216.

  27. Driver A, Cowling RM, Maze K: Planning for living landscapes: perspectives and lessons from South Africa. [http://www.forest-trends.org/biodiversityoffsetprogram/BBop%20library%202/South%20Africa%20-%20All%20Not%20Printed/Planning%20for%20Living%20Landscapes.pdf]

    Botanical Society of South Africa

  28. Sposito V, Morse-McNabb E: GIS-based modelling of regional conservation significance.

    Applied GIS 2006, 2:1-20.


rating: 4.00 from 2 votes | updated on: 11 Jan 2008 | views: 5285 |

Rate article:







excellent!bad…