Login

Join for Free!
61540 members
table of contents table of contents

Recent studies on song variation in Common Nightingales Luscinia megarhynchos have revealed …


');

Biology Articles » Zoology » Zoosemiotics » Causes and consequences of song amplitude adjustment in a territorial bird: a case study in nightingales » References

References
- Causes and consequences of song amplitude adjustment in a territorial bird: a case study in nightingales

BELMORE NF, KEWLEY-PORT D, MOBLEY RL AND GOODMAN VE. 1973. The development of auditory feedback monitoring: delayed auditory feedback studies on the vocalizations of children aged six month to 18 month. J Speech Hearing Res 16: 709-720.  

BRADBURY JW AND VEHRENCAMP SL. 1998. Principles of Animal Communication. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.  

BRUMM H. 2002. Sound radiation patterns in nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) songs. J Orn 143: 468-471.

BRUMM H. 2004. The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territoral bird. J Anim Ecol: in press.

BRUMM H AND HULTSCH H. 2001. Pattern amplitude is related to pattern imitation during the vocal development of nightingales. Anim Behav 61: 747-754.         [ Links ]

BRUMM H AND TODT D. 2002. Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird. Anim Behav 63: 891-897.

BRUMM H AND TODT D. 2003. Facing the rival: directional singing behaviour in nightingales. Behaviour 140: 43-53.

BRUMM H AND TODT D. 2004. Male-male vocal interactions and the adjustment of song amplitude in a territorial bird. Anim Behav 67: 281-286.

BRUMM H, VOSS K, KÖLLMER I AND TODT D. 2004. Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey. J Exp Biol 207: 443-448.

CYNX J, LEWIS R, TAVEL B AND TSE H. 1998. Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird, Taeniopygia guttata. Anim Behav 56: 107-113.

DABELSTEEN T. 1981. The sound pressure level in the dawn song of the blackbird Turdus merula and a method for adjusting the level in experimental song to the level in natural song. Z Tierpsych 56: 137-149.  

DABELSTEEN T, MCGREGOR PK, LAMPE HM, LANGMORE NE AND HOLLAND J. 1998. Quiet song in song birds: an overlooked phenomenon. Bioacoustics 9: 89-105.

GERHARDT HC AND HUBER F. 2002. Acoustic communication in insects and anurans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

GIL D AND GAHR M. 2002. The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 133-141.

HULTSCH H AND TODT D. 1982. Temporal performance roles during vocal interactions in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11: 253-260.

KLUMP GM. 1996. Bird communication in the noisy world. In: KROODSMA DE AND MILLER EH (Eds), Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, p. 321-338.

KOBAYASI KI AND OKANOYA K. 2003. Sex differences in amplitude regulation of distance calls in Bengalese finches, Lonchura striata var. domestica. Anim Biol 53: 173-182.

KONISHI M. 1965. The role of auditory feedback in the control of vocalization in the White-crowned Sparrow. Z Tierpsychol 22: 770-783.

LEE BS. 1950. Effects of delayed speech feedback. J Acoust Soc Am 22: 639-640.

LEONARDO A AND KONISHI M. 1999. Decrystallization of adult birdsong by perturbation of auditory feedback. Nature 399: 466-470.

LOMBARD E. 1911. Le signe de l'élévation de la voix. Annales des Maladies de l'Oreille et du Larynx 37: 101-119.

MANABE K, SADR EI AND DOOLING RJ. 1998. Control of vocal intensity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): differential reinforcement of vocal intensity and the Lombard effect. J Acoust Soc Am 103: 1190-1198.

MARLER P. 1967. Comparative study of song development in sparrows. In: Snow DW (Ed), Proceedings of the XIV International Ornithological Congress. Oxford: Blackwell, p. 231-244.

MARTEN K AND MARLER P. 1977. Sound transmission and its significance for animal communication. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2: 271-290.

MENNILL DJ, RATCLIFFE LM AND BOAG PT. 2002. Female eavesdropping on male song contest in songbirds. Science 296: 873.

MOUGEOT F AND BRETAGNOLLE V. 2000. Predation as a cost of sexual communication in nocturnal seabirds: an experimental approach using acoustic signals. Anim Behav 60: 647-656.

NAGUIB M AND TODT D. 1997. Effects of dyadic vocal interactions on other conspecific receivers in nightingales. Anim Behav 54: 1535-1543.

OBERWEGER K AND GOLLER F. 2001. The metabolic costs of birdsong production. J Exp Biol 204: 3379-3388.

OTTER K, MCGREGOR PK, TERRY AMR, BURFORD FRL, PEAKE TM AND DABELSTEEN T. 1999. Do female Great Tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback. Proc Roy Soc Lond B266: 1305-1309.

PEAKE TM, MCGREGOR PK, TERRY AMR and AND DABELSTEEN T. 2001. Male Great Tits eavesdrop on simulated male-to-male vocal interactions. Proc Roy Soc Lond B268: 1183-1187.

POTASH LM. 1972. Noice-induced changes in calls of the Japanese quail. Psychonom Sci 26: 252-254.

PYTTE CL, RUSCH KM AND FICKEN MS. 2003. Regulation of vocal amplitude by the Blue-throated Hummingbird Lampornis clemenciae. Anim Behav 66: 701-710.

SEARCY WA. 1996. Sound-pressure levels and song preferences in female Red-winged Blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) (Aves, Emberizidae). Ethology 102: 187-196.

SINNOTT JM, STEBBINS WC AND MOODY DB. 1975. Regulation of voice amplitude by the monkey. J Acoust Soc Am 58: 412-414.

THOMAS RJ. 2002. The costs of singing in nightingales. Anim Behav 63: 959-966.

TODT D. 1981. On functions of vocal matching: effect of counter-replies on song post choice and singing. Z Tierpsychol 57: 73-93.

TODT D AND HULTSCH H. 1996. Acquisition and performance of song repertoires: ways of coping with diversity and versatility. In: KROODSMA DE AND MILLER EH (Eds), Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, p. 79-96.

TODT D AND NAGUIB M. 2000. Vocal interactions in birds: the use of song as a model in communication. Adv Study Behav 29: 247-296.

WARD S, SPEAKMAN JR AND SLATER PJB. 2003. The energy costs of song in the canary, Serinus canaria. Anim Behav 65: 893-902.

ZUK M AND KOLLURU GR. 1998. Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. Quart Rev Biol 73: 415-438.

 


rating: 0.00 from 0 votes | updated on: 17 Oct 2007 | views: 3588 |

Rate article:







excellent!bad…