Login

Join for Free!
112510 members
table of contents table of contents

Biology Articles » Health and Medicine » Biomedicine and international human rights law: in search of a global consensus » References

References
- Biomedicine and international human rights law: in search of a global consensus

1. Papisca A. L'internazionalizzazione dei diritti umani: Verso un diritto panumano. [The internationalization of human rights: towards a panhuman law.] In: Cardia C, ed. I primordi della storia mondiale. Milan: Giuffrè, 1999. In Italian. 

2. Taylor A. Making the World Health Organization work: A legal framework for universal access to the conditions for health. American Journal of Law and Medicine 1992;4:301-46. 

3. UNESCO. Universal declaration on the human genome and human rights. Available from: URL: http://www.unesco.org/ethics (accessed 11 October 2002).

4. Council of Europe Convention on human rights and biomedicine. Available from: URL: http://www.legal.coe.int/bioethics/gb/html/txt_adopt.htm (accessed on 11 October 2002).

5. Spiegelberg H. Human dignity: a challenge to contemporary philosophy. In: Gotesky R, Laszlo E, eds. Human dignity. This century and the next. New York: Gordon and Breach, 1970:39-64. 

6. United Nations. Universal declaration of human rights. Preamble. Available from: URL: http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html (accessed 15 October 2002).

7. Kant I. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. [Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals.] Berlin: Akademie-Ausgabe, 1911. In German. 

8. Andorno R. The paradoxical notion of human dignity. Rivista internazionale di filosofia del diritto 2001;2:151-68.

9. Dworkin R. Taking rights seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977.

10. Lenoir N, Mathieu B. Les normes internationales de la bioéthique. [International bioethics rules.] Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1998.  In French.

11. Viola F. Etica e metaetica dei diritti umani. [Ethics and metaethics of human rights.] Torino: Giappichelli, 2000.    In Italian.

12. Thomasma D. Proposing a new agenda: bioethics and international human rights. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2001;10:299-310. 

13. Knowles L. The lingua franca of human rights and the rise of a global bioethic. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2001;10:253-63.

14. Maritain J. L'Homme et l'Etat. [Man and the State.] Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1953.  In French.

15. Glendon MA. A world made new: Eleanor Roosevelt and the universal declaration of human rights. New York: Random House, 2001.

16. Annas GJ, Andrews L, Isasi RM. Protecting the endangered human: Toward an international treaty prohibiting cloning and inheritable alterations. American Journal of Law and Medicine 2002;28:151-78. 

17. Marks S. Tying Prometheus down: the international law of human genetic manipulation. Chicago Journal of International Law 2002;3:115-36.

18. Global Lawyers and Physicians. Database of global policies on human cloning and germ-line engineering legislation on cloning and germ-line interventions. Available from: URL: http://www.glphr.org/genetic/genetic.htm (accessed on 11 October 2002).

19. Indian Council of Medical Research. Ethical guidelines for biomedical research on human subjects. Guidelines No. 3: statement of specific principles for human genetics research. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research, 2000. Available from: URL: http://www.icmr.nic.in/ ethical.pdf (accessed on 11 October 2002). 

20. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. Declaration of Inuyama on human genome mapping, genetic screening and gene therapy. Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, 1990.

21. British Medical Association. Human genetics. Choice and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

22. Council for Responsible Genetics. Position paper on human germline manipulation. Cambridge: Council for Responsible Genetics, 1992. Available from: URL: http://www.gene-watch.org/programs/cloning/position.html (accessed on 11 October 2002). 

23. Habermas J. Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik? [The future of the human nature. On the way to liberal eugenics?] Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2001.  In German.

24. Kass LR. Toward a more natural science. Biology and human affairs. New York: Free Press, 1985.

25. Renzong Q. Germ-line engineering as the eugenics of the future. In: Agius E, Busuttil S, eds. Germ-line intervention and our responsibilities to future generations. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998:105-16

26. Honnefelder L. Genetics and human health. In: Proceedings of the forum on genetics and the future of Europe. Brussels: European Commission, 2000. Available from: URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/quality-of-life/genetics/en/proceedings-hh03.html (accessed on 11 October 2002).

27. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Stem cell therapy: the ethical issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 2001. Available from: URL: http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/publications/index.asp (accessed on 11 October 2002).

28. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Ethical issues in human stem cell research. Volume I. Rockville, MA: National Bioethics Advisory Commission; 1999. 

29. President's Council on Bioethics. Human cloning and human dignity: an ethical inquiry (majority position). Washington, DC: President's Council on Bioethics, 2002. Available from: URL: http:// www.bioethics.gov/cloningreport (accessed on 11 October 2002).

30. United Nations. Ad hoc committee on an international convention against the reproductive cloning of human beings. Available from: URL: http://www.un.org/ law/cloning/ (accessed on 11 October 2002).

31. Council of Europe. Additional protocol on human cloning to the European convention on human rights and biomedicine. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1998.

32. World Medical Association. Resolution on Cloning. Ferney-Voltaire: World Medical Association, 1997.

33. Right to the integrity of the person. In: Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: 2000:18 (Article 3.2).

34. European Parliament. Resolution of March 12, 1997. Official Journal of the European Communities C1997;115:92.

35. European Parliament. Resolution of January 15, 1998. Official Journal of the European Communities C 1998;34:164.

36. European Parliament. Resolution of March 30, 2000. Official Journal of the European Communities C 2000:378:95.

37. Robertson J. The question of human cloning. Hastings Center Report 1994;24:6-14.

38. Harris J. Clones, genes and human rights. In: Burley J, ed. The genetic revolution and human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999:61-94.

39. Wu L. Family planning through human cloning: Is there a fundamental right? Columbia Law Review 1998;98:1461-515. 

40. Kass LR. The wisdom of repugnance. In: Kass LR, Wilson JQ, The ethics of human cloning. Washington: AEI Press, 1998:3-59.

41. Jonas H. Technik, Medizin und Ethik. [Technology, Medicine and Ethics.] Frankfurt: Insel, 1985:162-203.  In German.

42. Atlan H. Possibilités biologiques, impossibilités sociales [Biological possibilities, social impossibilities]. In: Atlan H, Augé H, Delmas-Marty M, Droit R-P, Fresco N, eds. Le clonage humain. Paris: éditions du Seuil, 1999:17-41. In French.

43. Putnam H. Cloning people. In: Burley J, ed. The genetic revolution and human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999:1-13.

44. Annas GJ. Why we should ban human cloning. New England Journal of Medicine 1998;339:122-5.

45. Rose A. Reproductive misconception: Why cloning is not just another assisted reproductive technology. Duke Law Journal 1999;48:1133-55

46. National Research Council. Scientific and medical aspects of human reproductive cloning. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2002. Available from: URL: http://www.nap.edu/books/0309076374/html (accessed on October 11, 2002).

rating: 5.00 from 2 votes | updated on: 21 Jul 2009 | views: 9999 |

Rate article:







excellent!bad…